an uneasy peace granted by MAD is preferable to the bloodshed of conventional warfare, at least to me.
there is absolutely no reason for any state to use a nuclear weapon in today's world. i like to think of them as an unfortunate holdover.
drama aside, the international scene is far, far different than it was on those days in 1945.
Joe90 wrote:
Why have a world war if using a nuclear bomb will wipe out the whole world population and nobody wins?
one nuke can spoil an atoll for a while, but it won't kill everyone. i have enough faith (please don't let it be misplaced) in the world left to believe that if a nuclear weapon were to be used in war, it would be local (thnk india/pakistan) and not a global hellfire
Joe90 wrote:
Isn't the whole point of war is to win?
meet objectives, gain land, secure borders, etc etc. repeal an invader who wishes to do the same. generally, the less casualties you suffer, the better. i'd say, the whole point of war is to end it as quickly as possible.
Joe90 wrote:
I hate living a life of threat like this. What if a nuclear bomb is being lit right now? I don't want to die.

there's been over 2500 nuclear weapons detonated. i guess you and i are lucky to be young enough that we don't remember a time where such fears were more commonplace.
why do you think a nuke would be used right now? i don't mean to be rude, this is sincere. what events, happenings are triggering these fears?
people have been living under threat since time immemorial, and i believe that is something that will never change....
_________________
הייתי צוללת עכשיו למים
הכי, הכי עמוקים
לא לשמוע כלום
לא לדעת כלום
וזה הכל אהובי, זה הכל.