kraftiekortie wrote:
The only way we could “transcend” agriculture is if we go back to a Paleolithic, hunter-gatherer society.
Trade: we can never transcend.
trade is and has always been a symptom of dysfunctional environments. period. it has never been necessary for the survival, health, and fulfillment of human life nor society. and by trade I am talking about actually making agreements to exchange things with other people, I'm not playing word games where you change the definition of the word trade to be about anything you want. composting organic matter and harvesting food from healthy soil is NOT an example of trade, just so you know.
agriculture, when practiced longterm, is and has always been a disease. agriculture DOES NOT mean "growing food". agriculture refers to a very specific method of cultivation based on constantly fighting against ecological succession to maintain fields of primary succession species generally in very low diversity and only for the use of human consumption. agriculture is a war against life, and it is less productive than diverse multi-layered perennial food systems, which can obviously be cultivated. there are many other forms of cultivation besides agriculture. the only time that agriculture is valid is when it is used temporarily as a kickstart for landscapes that have been damaged severely by natural disasters, as a way to kickstart ecological succession through intentional ground covering with a field of primary succession species. but then it has to go on with ecological succession, you have to continue cultivating further succession, or else it only damages the land and eventually turns it into a desert, just like longterm agriculture has been doing for thousands of years. you can literally see the vast scars across continents, when looking at satellite images, from agriculture spreading around the world.
the concept of hunter-gatherers is rather out of touch with the reality of pre-agricultural societies. hunter-gatherer is a term that frames societies as minimalist scavengers. this is definitely not the norm. the norm is and was societies integrated intentionally with their local environments. there have of course been thousands and thousands of variations of this around the world so it's not exactly useful to talk about pre-agricultural societies as one group.
trade is a symptom of longterm agriculture. if people cultivated highly diverse perennial food systems integrated symbiotically with ecosystems - which is totally possible and has been done many times, more productive than agriculture, and can be done in a wider range of landscapes than agriculture - in ways that provide what is needed to survive, be healthy, and find fulfillment locally, then trade becomes irrelevant for survival, health, and fulfillment. obviously trade could still be practiced recreationally, there's nothing really wrong with that if people want to do it.