babybird wrote:
If you was 82 I think you would be exempt from this anyway.
I know that, but I'd still be fuming for those that can't have children.
But at my age and with all the price inflation I do not want to have to pay tax for not having children. I've never known to pay tax for something you DON'T do/have. It's a bit like taxing people who don't have a car. It's inhumane and discrimination. It's disgusting. And it's ridiculous.
Quote:
She knows they won't.
I don't
know, I just
hope.
And it'd probably be wrong, and selfish, of me to just have a baby so that I don't have to pay the childless tax, right? Because if they do bring this new thing out, that's what people are going to be doing. There'll be a lot of children being brought up in bad relationships. And if you say that it's more expensive to have children than not, then what difference would taxing people without children make then?
It's just absurd and unrealistic.
It just frightens me how the geniuses that invent these bright ideas just don't think these things through first.
_________________
Female