jmnixon95 wrote:
I spell it "color" and
it's also taught that way. I like the simplified spellings anyways.

In the US I'm sure it is. In the UK it isn't.
Sometimes I have pretend, playful arguments about it, and tease Americans about their "incorrect" spelling and let them tease me about mine, but it's all in fun. Neither are right or wrong - just different.
Actually, US English stayed more true to original English. Those who emigrated to the US seemed to retain the original words far better - it's just that they developed funny accents.
Over here, we
used to spell the controversial words "honor" and "color" etc in the "American" way. We also
used to say "gotten" instead of "got." You may silence any Brit who tries to argue that it's always been spelt "got" by pointing out the old saying "ill-gotten gains," which is still in use in British English today. Also, it makes no sense for the verb "get" to suddenly become irregular when "forget" and "beget" are both changed to "forgotten" and "begotten." Why should "get" not remain a regular verb and follow this pattern as well, and become "gotten?"
Nontheless, I am a Brit, and I talk and spell like one - not because our randomly evolved language makes more sense, but because it's ours.
Certain grating Americanisms have infiltrated the British language. A major one that annoys me is:
"How are you?"
"
I'm good."
"I am not enquiring after your moral status. I'm enquiring after your health. Are you WELL?!"