Declension wrote:
The cult of pi is pure nonsense. Pi is not "the" fundamental circle constant! It's just an artifact of how we write mathematics. We could write mathematics using 1/pi or 2pi instead, and it would all work out the same. The entire family of numbers derived from pi are collectively an interesting collection that has something to do with circles. But pi itself is not a particularly distinguished member of this family!
True.
Declension wrote:
I get even more annoyed when people memorise the decimal representation of pi.
3.1415926535897

(used be able to quote it to up to 50 decimals ~ forgotten the rest)
Declension wrote:
This is silly and arbitrary in two ways.
Opinion.
Declension wrote:
First, pi is not a particularly special number when compared to its relatives.
Opinion again. It is special in that the result is always the same no matter what the dimensions of the circle.
Declension wrote:
Second, the decimal system is an arbitrary artifact of the fact that we have ten fingers...
Self contradictory. The fact that it is based on humans having ten fingers is anything but arbitrary.
Declension wrote:
...and is not a natural mathematical idea.
Oxymoron. Mathematics isn't natural, therefore there is no such thing as "natural mathematics."
(My opinion)
On a side note, I've always wondered what mathematics would be like if our system were base pi instead of base ten. Pi would then be represented by "1." Would that then mean that all other numbers end up becoming never ending decimals?
_________________
I'm not likely to be around much longer. As before when I first signed up here years ago, I'm finding that after a long hiatus, and after only a few days back on here, I'm spending way too much time here again already. So I'm requesting my account be locked, banned or whatever. It's just time. Until then, well, I dunno...