Page 2 of 2 [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

BazzaMcKenzie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,495
Location: the Antipodes

24 Jan 2007, 8:25 pm

I doubt whether any of these types of studies are bias free.

I saw a newspaper report last year of an academic study that showed black africans had a lower average IQ than other races. The researcher was howled down as a racist. Research that shows racists as having lower average IQ is applauded by the PC types because its the outcome they want. Its like saying communists have lower IQ than free marketeers.

Does anyone know what the sample sizes were (I can't be bothered looking). Is 4 points statistically significant. If there were any sample groups that happed to have the reverse outcome (racist sample more intelligent) I bet the results were never published. :?

Asians (I believe) can be very racist. More so than WASPs. Would this study be relevent in Asia too?


_________________
I just dropped in to see what condition my condition was in.
Strewth!


TheMachine1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,011
Location: 9099 will be my last post...what the hell 9011 will be.

24 Jan 2007, 8:36 pm

BazzaMcKenzie wrote:
I doubt whether any of these types of studies are bias free.

I saw a newspaper report last year of an academic study that showed black africans had a lower average IQ than other races. The researcher was howled down as a racist. Research that shows racists as having lower average IQ is applauded by the PC types because its the outcome they want. Its like saying communists have lower IQ than free marketeers.

Does anyone know what the sample sizes were (I can't be bothered looking). Is 4 points statistically significant. If there were any sample groups that happed to have the reverse outcome (racist sample more intelligent) I bet the results were never published. :?

Asians (I believe) can be very racist. More so than WASPs. Would this study be relevent in Asia too?


That site is clearly not basing its results on hard science. Its more a
slam against racism. But I'm sure they feel as i do that there could be truth in the concept though.



BazzaMcKenzie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,495
Location: the Antipodes

24 Jan 2007, 8:48 pm

TheMachine1 wrote:
But I'm sure they feel as i do that there could be truth in the concept though.

I think its self evident that to believe what the neo-nazis say or to wear a white hood on your head, your not really all that smart :lol:


_________________
I just dropped in to see what condition my condition was in.
Strewth!


Quest_techie
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 380

24 Jan 2007, 9:24 pm

amerikasend wrote:
You people should to the test done by Harvard to see if you're a racist or not. I thought everyone was racist in some sort of way or another.

https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/research/


so, now lets pause and think about this, that test gives a positive bias <a not racist bias> and I suspect pretty much every other racism test does aso, to people who don't make ignorant assumptions about other cultures <like that people in wheelchairs can't ski or something silly like that> so, if someone is less ignorant, lets say has a wider base of knowledge, a higher capacity to absorb information, dare I say a higher I.Q. than that son of a b***h is going to score higher on the not-a-bigot-o-meter

statistically insignificant collation of bad data

that test's scores can be manipulated on top of the fact that they are biased in a way that screams to me that the people putting the tests together are a little bigoted