Campin_Cat wrote:
Do you go line-by-line?
I started line-by-line. And, I began to see multiple shapes that looked like pandas (to me). Then, as Earthling mentioned, I wondered if it was a trick. After all, according to the article, the puzzle was really difficult. So, I wondered whether a group of “snowmen together create[d] an image of a panda”. After about 5 seconds, I decided to look at a picture of a real panda. After doing that, I then went back to line-by-line, and found it rather quickly.
Campin_Cat wrote:
I rather like "Search-a-Words", also (I like crosswords, better, though); and, like Raleigh said, the words just kinda jump out at me, INITIALLY----and then, when they STOP (jumpin'-out, at me), I go line-by-line.
This is how I do it at well.
This reminded me of an interesting computerized test that an autism researcher shared with me about a year ago. The test consisted of a set of randomly distributed blue and red sticks. The sticks were positioned in one of two directions – diagonally left to right or diagonally right to left. The researcher would display a “snapshot” of these sticks in (I believe) a 200ms timeframe (though it may have been 500ms). I was asked to determine whether or not one of the blue sticks was positioned diagonally left to right.
When the researcher displayed it, it came up fast. It was very difficult. I only saw the blue stick (in the correct direction), occasionally. But only if it was near the first place I started to look (usually, I scanned left to right). But, this process was much too slow. As there was a “sea of sticks”. I mentioned it was like finding a “needle in a haystack”. To which the researcher replied, “It’s more like finding a needle in a sea of needles”.
The researcher (who was also on the spectrum) then proceeded to show me that she could do it, without problems. It’s like the researcher “recorded” the picture and could instantly identify the piece. It was amazing. I wish I could remember the web site where that test was offered.