Fnord wrote:
Rhetorical question: Why do people express their desire for someone to stay only after that someone has left?
Why do you ask a nonsensical question like that?
And that is NOT rhetorical. Am really curious as to an answer.
The obvious answers to your question are:
Because (a)
You don't wave "goodbye" to guests staying at your house two days before they leave. You wave goodbye to them AS they leave.
and because of (b)
We don't have psychic powers.
There is no reason for anyone to "express their desire" for a second person "to stay" on WP until that second person announces that that are going to "leave Wrong planet".
First off, its not even "after" he is leaving, its being expressed at the moment he is announcing he is leaving. Not the same thing as waiting eight weeks later, and then giving condolences.
Second we cant look into Twiz's skull and read his mind, nor can we see into the future, and think "oh my gosh, in eight weeks Twiz is going consider leaving the WP site, ergo I should prevent that by begging Twiz to stay now."
He may have dropped hints about this that I missed, but as far I know he was more involved than ever in posting here on WP up to the moment he started this thread. So there is no reason for anyone to think that he wanted to leave. And I for one am among the shocked that he wanted to leave.
What are you suggesting I do? Go back in a time machine to eight weeks ago, and then push my past (eight weeks ago) self away from the computer keyboard, and then type pleas to Twiz to stay on WP- so I would be ahead of the curve now?
I don't think that Einstein would approve of that sorta mucking around with the space-time continuum!