Freudian personality type
Fnord wrote:
Freudian Personality Test
Your Freudian Personality Style is: Phallic-Compensative*
Self-controlled, sober, and seemingly mild-mannered, you have great facility with analytical arguments, which you use as a double-edged sword, pointing them as much at yourself as you do at others. Socially, you are a bit impassive and vacuous, and you may attach yourself to someone (such as a significant other or female parent) whom you perceive to be better at social interaction and 'all the emotional stuff' than you are, thus neglecting the development of yourself in that area. Metaphorically, your personality style may be likened to a five-year-old who is aware that he is not the favorite child in the family but at the same time wishes that he were. As a result of this envy, you have developed a compensative attitude where you dismantle the dominance of others by analytically picking apart their activities, laying bare their weaknesses and exposing the special treatment that they have received and the double standards they live by. However, while it may seem like you are just being equitable and even-handed, your true motivations are nevertheless personal envy and a longing to compensate for your frustrated need to dominate. One proof of these ignoble motives that underlie your seemingly noble actions is that you sometimes go overboard in your exposition when exposing the flaws of someone whom you perceive to be 'mightier' than you, and that when doing so you can even become a bit moralistic and persecuting, in marked contradistinction to your usual easygoing self.
Your Freudian Personality Style is: Phallic-Compensative*
Self-controlled, sober, and seemingly mild-mannered, you have great facility with analytical arguments, which you use as a double-edged sword, pointing them as much at yourself as you do at others. Socially, you are a bit impassive and vacuous, and you may attach yourself to someone (such as a significant other or female parent) whom you perceive to be better at social interaction and 'all the emotional stuff' than you are, thus neglecting the development of yourself in that area. Metaphorically, your personality style may be likened to a five-year-old who is aware that he is not the favorite child in the family but at the same time wishes that he were. As a result of this envy, you have developed a compensative attitude where you dismantle the dominance of others by analytically picking apart their activities, laying bare their weaknesses and exposing the special treatment that they have received and the double standards they live by. However, while it may seem like you are just being equitable and even-handed, your true motivations are nevertheless personal envy and a longing to compensate for your frustrated need to dominate. One proof of these ignoble motives that underlie your seemingly noble actions is that you sometimes go overboard in your exposition when exposing the flaws of someone whom you perceive to be 'mightier' than you, and that when doing so you can even become a bit moralistic and persecuting, in marked contradistinction to your usual easygoing self.


Pepe wrote:
Premise 1: You are a badass with megalomaniacal tendencies.
Premise 2: You attract multiple incompatible mates.
Ergo,
Conclusion: You must have a big back yard. <EEP!>
Premise 2: You attract multiple incompatible mates.
Ergo,
Conclusion: You must have a big back yard. <EEP!>

No, I'm a free-range megalomaniac. I have no yard.
Pepe wrote:
Does the term "Praying Mantis" mean anything to you?
That's pretty much the exact opposite of what I mean. I'm a team-based player in relationships (all relationships - work, family, friends, romantic, etc.) and have no desire for either a dominant or submissive (or eat-the-other-person) role, but I often have to defend against others trying to dominate me because they misjudge my fighting spirit due to an incongruent outward appearance.
Brisienna wrote:
That's pretty much the exact opposite of what I mean. I'm a team-based player in relationships (all relationships - work, family, friends, romantic, etc.) and have no desire for either a dominant or submissive (or eat-the-other-person) role, but I often have to defend against others trying to dominate me because they misjudge my fighting spirit due to an incongruent outward appearance.
I'm usually a very funny guy.
People laugh at me all the time.

Though I do tend to push the boundaries of humour more than most.

P.S.
I edited the original post.

Brisienna wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Premise 1: You are a badass with megalomaniacal tendencies.
Premise 2: You attract multiple incompatible mates.
Ergo,
Conclusion: You must have a big back yard. <EEP!>
No, I'm a free-range megalomaniac. I have no yard...Premise 2: You attract multiple incompatible mates.
Ergo,
Conclusion: You must have a big back yard. <EEP!>

I could be wrong, though.
Fnord wrote:
Brisienna wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Premise 1: You are a badass with megalomaniacal tendencies.
Premise 2: You attract multiple incompatible mates.
Ergo,
Conclusion: You must have a big back yard. <EEP!>
No, I'm a free-range megalomaniac. I have no yard...Premise 2: You attract multiple incompatible mates.
Ergo,
Conclusion: You must have a big back yard. <EEP!>

I could be wrong, though.
I believe Brisienna got the joke.
Confirmation on that would be appreciated either way.

All information is good information.

Fnord wrote:
Brisienna wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Premise 1: You are a badass with megalomaniacal tendencies.
Premise 2: You attract multiple incompatible mates.
Ergo,
Conclusion: You must have a big back yard. <EEP!>
No, I'm a free-range megalomaniac. I have no yard...Premise 2: You attract multiple incompatible mates.
Ergo,
Conclusion: You must have a big back yard. <EEP!>

Oh, ok... thanks for the clarification. I wasn't initially able to grasp the implied logic at all, so my deduction was to think he meant my dating pool must be pretty broad for guys to not warn among themselves to not get involved with me. Which would be true as I move around a lot and have lived primarily centered around major metropolitan areas.
Now I am in a small town, though, prioritizing family and other life needs over dating potential, and feeling a lot of stress over the interconnectedness dynamics that I'm not used to, so that's probably why my sensitivities went there.
Pepe wrote:
I'm usually a very funny guy.
People laugh at me all the time.
Though I do tend to push the boundaries of humour more than most.
People laugh at me all the time.

Though I do tend to push the boundaries of humour more than most.
It's ok, I can take a joke if I know it's a joke. I'm not offended in any way. Was more worried that I was miscommunicating what I meant somehow.
Brisienna wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Brisienna wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Premise 1: You are a badass with megalomaniacal tendencies.
Premise 2: You attract multiple incompatible mates.
Ergo,
Conclusion: You must have a big back yard. <EEP!>
No, I'm a free-range megalomaniac. I have no yard...Premise 2: You attract multiple incompatible mates.
Ergo,
Conclusion: You must have a big back yard. <EEP!>

Oh... thanks for the clarification. I wasn't initially able to grasp the implied logic at all, so my deduction was to think he meant my dating pool must be pretty broad for guys to not warn among themselves to not get involved with me. Which would be true as I move around a lot and have lived primarily centered around major metropolitan areas.
Now I am in a small town, though, prioritizing family and other life needs over dating potential, and feeling a lot of stress over the interconnectedness dynamics that I'm not used to, so that's probably why my sensitivities went there.
Pepe wrote:
I'm usually a very funny guy.
People laugh at me all the time.
Though I do tend to push the boundaries of humour more than most.
People laugh at me all the time.

Though I do tend to push the boundaries of humour more than most.
It's ok, I can take a joke if I know it's a joke. I'm not offended in any way. Was more worried that I was miscommunicating what I meant somehow.
Well, we only just met so misunderstandings are to be expected.
Fnord knew where I was coming from.
He was spot on.
That was precisely what I meant,
Except I used a "Praying Mantis" rather than a "Black Widow".
The Praying Mantis female dispatches the male by biting its head off if it isn't nimble enough to get away.
Hence, the need for a big back yard to get rid of the evidence.

I didn't actually think you were dispatching partners and burying them in the back yard.
But to be fair, I don't know you that well, so it could have been the case.


I'm broad-minded.
If it did happen, they probably deserved it.

Similar Topics | |
---|---|
borderline personality disorder
in Bipolar, Tourettes, Schizophrenia, and other Psychological Conditions |
12 Jul 2025, 5:58 pm |
British media personality Sam Thompson is AuDHD |
26 May 2025, 6:40 pm |
Autism Asperger's ADHD and addictive Personality |
13 Jul 2025, 7:56 am |