envirozentinel wrote:
They should only apply lockdown to the elderly, non-economically active population. I have to agree that the lockdown is worse than the virus. It's harming business. How will people like my brother in law recover when the government is acting like a nanny? We just need common sense. Around 80% of those who get the virus will be asymtomatic or be able to recover at home.
There's never been a lockdown for regular flu, yet that kills people too.
I've only broken lockdown once - a cross country walk/jog on isolated mountain bike trails near the river. It was so liberating to see a few wild flowers and just be free.
@Darmok: It's got nothing to do with the Left - you're politicizing the issue. But the overzealous bureaucrats in our country are coming up with stupid regulations from "Level 5" (hard lockdown) to "Level 1 (easiest). It makes them feel like they're in control. Nothing like telling people what to do. And Aspies hate to be coerced.
But the people you mention will surely have contact with those not in the group's you mention. Elderly people don't just socialise, live with or come into contact with other elderly people
Also not being elderly isn't a sure sign you won't either have a serious form of the illness (and take up hospital space and equipment) or die from it. There have been perfectly healthy people die too
I don't understand why people are still comparing It to flu when it isn't the flu (which is presumably why the measures are in place for this and not the flu). Also there is the flu jab which you get free in the UK if you're elderly or have an underlying health issue that makes you more vulnerable to it.
It seems to be all down to chance, but not just for yourself but those around you and I'd personally rather not infect someone who might later die.