KOOPA wrote:
loudmouth wrote:
I'd say no to all Secret society conspiracy theories, simply because there's more than enough social an political corruption to go around. So much that any "Secret society" would be redundant, Why overelaborate a situation beyond what it is.
CFR, Bildenburgs, Trilaterials... These are some of your "secret societies" today, and no it's not a conspiracy. All you got to do is look at the people that attend these meetings then it becomes very clear. It's mainly the international bankers (that have no sides), top politicians, acadamics, major media talk heads, and the big protestant churchs leaders that control our government. Not just in the US, but all over the world. Most of them are all on the same team. If you ever wonder why all the media talk heads will talk about this left/right crap, the will keep you focused on wedge issues, while they are excelling their agenda (what you don't hear on in the MSM) using your tax money through inflation and taxes to create a one world government, because they're all on the same page.
Come on, academics have almost zero real influence (they don't control vast amounts of wealth, they have no army, they're not usually famous and they don't usually have much of a political machine). Bankers, etc, have some common interests, but they're also competitors - since markets, etc are finite it is ultimately in their interest to bankrupt their rivals. Do you really think that Vladimir Putin and the Western oil & gas companies are on the same page? Or Microsoft and Apple? Carlos Slim and AT&T? China and Western patent holders? Boeing and Airbus? Vietnamese and Colombian coffee growers?
Sure, the US media is sycophantic and spineless, wedge issues are mostly red herrings, there's plenty of behind-the-scenes lobbying, and there aren't many genuine democracies out there (probably just one, a small Alpine country divided by both language and religion) and there is often little real difference between viable candidates (yeah, some would make better dinner guests than others) - but that is not equivalent to a
single,
unified clique running everything - just a bunch of corrupt cliques that sometimes strike marriages of convenience, sometimes clash, sometimes have infighting (so what else is new?).
What would that world government consist of? The UN, which is about as powerful as East Timor? G-7 (increasingly irrelevant as it doesn't include India or China)?
_________________
I am the steppenwolf that never learned to dance. (Sedaka)
El hombre es una bestia famélica, envidiosa e insaciable. (Francisco Tario)
I'm male by the way (yes, I know my avatar is misleading).
23 Jan 2008, 2:15 pm
