Samara wrote:
Your against people having children out of wedlock and then your against abortion. Well if people shouldnt have babies out of wedlock. They should be able to terminate thier pregnancy.
Some people say abortion is murder and say if to kill a fetus that has not got any nerves developed yet as to feel any pain; was murder.
Which is worse? a three year old girl being bashed and then he picks her up and throws her against the wall like a rag doll.
He is still in a rage and goes runs a boiling hot bath. Grabs the little girl and throws her in. She is scolded to death.
Now that was a true story and the mother of that child had seeked a termination in her early pregnancy but because of the stupid protesters she was unable to access the clinic.
People who are against abortion are supporting child abuse because many children so severly abused that they really would be better off not to be here. I guess some of them don't make it and are murdered.

How f***ing tragic is that in comparison to having an early pregnancy abortion

And then there's adoption.
I don't get why there's only two choices: abort, or abuse. Ok, I know being a kid in foster care ain't a walk in the park, but why is this never considered the viable alternative?
_________________
Still grateful.
"...do you really think you're in control...?"
Diagnosis: uncertain.