ThatRedHairedGrrl wrote:
ManErg, there's worse...I was reading a US needlecraft book and I first came across those embroidery hoops that have a pad to sit on so you can have the frame across your lap and have both your hands free to sew. But I read the words 'fanny frame' and thought it must be some kind of torture device used by gynecologists.
That caused me to laugh and spit coffee all over my monitor screen at work ! !!
ThatRedHairedGrrl wrote:
Pudding as the British know it is either a) a generic term for the dessert course in a meal, or b) a specific type of dessert made by mixing suet, flour, sugar and other ingredients and boiling or baking the result. Unless it's Yorkshire Pudding....
In the UK, our language is still quite 'class' ridden despite rumours to the contrary. What's really confusing is when the highest and lowest classes use an identical word, but the middle classes use something different. I think 'pudding' is an example of this. Working class people have "pudding" after dinner (or tea...but that's another story that could take a book to explain). Middle class people have "dessert" after dinner. Yet whenever I've mingled with the upper crust, they call it 'pudding' again and to ask "what's for dessert?" could signal to everybody that you are a "social climber with pretentions, not genuine class".
The point is that the words we use have meanings beyond the dictionary definition.
AJCoyne wrote:
In Coventry, we call certain types of bread rolls "batches".
SO true! And incredibly, AFAIK it is ONLY in Coventry as people from only 15 miles away (24.14016 km, you see why miles are better?) in Birmingham have *never* heard of the word 'batch' used this way.
I can highly recommend the book "Darkest England" by Idries Shah to anyone wanting evidence that the British are the most inscrutable nation on earth.
http://www.amazon.com/Darkest-England-I ... 086304039X. Hilarious, yet illuminating at the same time!
_________________
Circular logic is correct because it is.