Bloodheart wrote:
Asp-Z wrote:
Well, to be fair, the Tories got most of the votes. They just didn't get enough seats to go into Parliament on their own. But they were only able to team up with the Lib Dems because they'd already got so many seats for themselves - clearly they were popular in the election.
This is true, but then add together Lib Dem and Labour votes, I think a lot comes down to us being annoyed by Labour, little other choice and not enough people realised voting Tory during an economic meltdown was a bad move...not enough people remembered Thatcher (although she did some good, and has her fans, for the working class blues in power is always a bad thing).
Having Labour in power for the economic crisis isn't exactly a great plan either. Who lent the banks tax payer money without devising a way to get it back? Who ran the Budget so it has a £154.7bn gap in it? Who set up a benefit system so easy to exploit that they pay out more in benefits than they get in income tax? Who created needless bureaucracy and quangos for everything? Who expanded the public sector so far that it started eating too far into private sector employment?
The answer to all of those, of course, is Labour.
Don't get me wrong, I don't exactly agree with how the "coalition" (in other words, the Tories with a Lib Dem tea boy) is dealing with things at the moment either, but Labour isn't some sort of ideal party with ideal policies. Far from it.