Telepathy.

Page 3 of 3 [ 41 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3

Joined: 16 Feb 2012
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 869
Location: Thornaby, UK

16 Mar 2012, 2:10 pm

Sorry mod if your shutting it down, I am interested because of the "EPOC neuroheadset" for games.

I just keep a open mind since you can't measure it & technicaly you don't get any classes in training. So anyone who claims they can do it all the time, must not be true.

But I keep a open mind. Because of the "EPOC neuroheadset".

hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

16 Mar 2012, 2:11 pm

i'd like to keep the thread open for people to have discussion about the topic.

_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105

Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,953
Location:

16 Mar 2012, 2:12 pm

hyperlexian wrote:

Fnord, this is getting old. if you don't agree with it, fine. but there is no excuse to taunt and belittle people just because you don't agree with their views. please be respectful.

Please specify where I have taunted or belittled anyone. I made reference to the Hugo Award because telepathic beings are a common feature of science-fiction stories, and receiving such an award would be a good thing.

As for the EPOC neuroheadset - this is not telepathy. It is measuring electromagnetic brainwave patterns and translating them into game controller signals. Telepathy is the alleged mind-to-mind communication of thoughts, experiences, memories, ideas, and ordimary "chatter".

Last edited by Fnord on 16 Mar 2012, 2:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

16 Mar 2012, 2:15 pm

Fnord wrote:

Where are you people getting this paranormal crap, and why are you not providing any relevant links?

Now, if you really think that there is any validity to this telepathy hokum, then please indulge yourselves in my 25-year old challenge...

"What Is In The Box?"

Just click on the above link, read the post, follow the instructions, and PM your answers - it is just that simple!

I'll be waiting.

Fnord

i bolded the applicable parts. you made snide remarks about something they actually care about and it is offensive.

_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105

Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,953
Location:

16 Mar 2012, 2:16 pm

hyperlexian wrote:

Fnord wrote:

i bolded the applicable parts. you made snide remarks about something they actually care about and it is offensive.

Okay then, so how should I refer to something that has never been proven to exist?

hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

16 Mar 2012, 2:20 pm

Fnord wrote:

hyperlexian wrote:

Fnord wrote:

i bolded the applicable parts. you made snide remarks about something they actually care about and it is offensive.

Okay then, so how should I refer to something that has never been proven to exist?

if you cannot find a way to respond to members respectfully on matters like this, stay out of these threads.

TechnoDog was also straddling the line with his first post, but we haven't had repeat problems with him doing this in most faith-based threads.

_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105

Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,953
Location:

16 Mar 2012, 2:27 pm

hyperlexian wrote:

Fnord wrote:

... how should I refer to something that has never been proven to exist?

if you cannot find a way to respond to members respectfully on matters like this, stay out of these threads.

Obviously, it is wrong to criticize a person for his or her beliefs. Is it now also wrong to criticize beliefs, as well? Please link to the rule that says this.

hyperlexian wrote:

TechnoDog was also straddling the line with his first post, but we haven't had repeat problems with him doing this in most faith-based threads.

This thread is not in a faith-based forum - it is not PP&R - nor it in The Haven, where nothing can be criticized. It is currently in Random Discussion, where it has long been held that disagreements and criticism were allowed, as long as they were not directed at the person. Has this changed?

hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

16 Mar 2012, 2:31 pm

Fnord wrote:

hyperlexian wrote:

Fnord wrote:

... how should I refer to something that has never been proven to exist?

if you cannot find a way to respond to members respectfully on matters like this, stay out of these threads.

Obviously, it is wrong to criticize a person for his or her beliefs. Is it now also wrong to criticize beliefs, as well? Please link to the rule that says this.

hyperlexian wrote:

TechnoDog was also straddling the line with his first post, but we haven't had repeat problems with him doing this in most faith-based threads.

you make a point of coming into threads like this and essentially belittling their beliefs. this has to stop. it is offensive, and offensive posts ARE against the rules. now that i am sure you understand, if you have any further questions feel free to send a PM to me or any other moderator. thank you.

_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105

Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,953
Location:

16 Mar 2012, 2:39 pm

So be it.

Page 3 of 3 [ 41 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3

Jump to:

Telepathy. Post Reply New Topic

Telepathy.