yellowtamarin wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
SaveFerris wrote:
yellowtamarin wrote:
I imagine them all literally.
Me too

I, and most folks do. That's what you're supposed to do to get the meaning.
Every time though? Most people only hear the intended meaning once they know what it is, which is why conversations are so thick with metaphors and such, as the literal meaning is ignored most of the time.
I don't think most people would talk the way they do if they were as literal- (and visual-) minded as me!
I have a friend who talks in cliches, metaphors, etc. a LOT. But he also gets them wrong a fair bit. Often I get confused so I ask him what he means, and he finds he doesn't actually know, when he tries to explain the words he used.
That is also true.
I try to avoid mixing metaphors. But all human languages are so thick with metaphors that its often hard to avoid.
George Orwell wrote a famous essay about language and politics that was in one of my college textbooks. In it he complained that "time and time again I have seen in print" the phrase "the fascist octopus has sung its swan song".
Not only is that mixing metaphors but its fun to try to visualize.
Imagine an octopus, and octopus wearing swastika armbands, and sporting a Hitler mustache, and wearing a Hitler type military hat. And then imagine the octopus lifting its tentacles, and then, breaking out into an operatic aria, and then...keeling over dead.
I had the misconception that the term "swan song" had something to do with the ballet "Swan Lake", but its a reference to something else. But just for the hell of it imagine our "fascist octopus" is also wearing a ballerina's tutu and that he expires on stage with the feminine grace of a ballerina. All in all its quite a workout for your brain to try to picture that!