IsabellaLinton wrote:
Fnord wrote:
IsabellaLinton wrote:
Actually, correction:
Fnord's post on my thread might have been a generalisation about dogs, before making this one.
Sorry if I mixed it up. Same sentiment. . .
Yes, you caught me out, Ms. Linton, and rightly so. This thread was inspired by YOUR post, and carried on the sarcastic tone therefrom.
And yes, Mr. Flake, the sarcasm is directed toward the act of claiming "Since a member of Group X did Y to me, then I condemn all members of Group X because they are all capable of doing Y."
Sometimes, ya just gotta say sumpin'. 
I thought I'd been imagining things. It was there one minute and POOF! Flushed clear off the page!
^ I did not want you to think I was being sarcastic toward
you, so I moved it to this thread.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.