Raleigh wrote:
Hello, everyone.
I have a few "hypothetical" questions of a moral/ethical nature.
1) If you have been given a certain time to live, but you have exceeded that prognosis by, say, almost 5 months, does that mean you are no longer "terminal"?
2) if you were told you would die and you then told others you would die, but you haven't died, does that mean that you have lied about your prognosis?
3) would it be a good idea to show evidence of your diagnosis in the above scenarios to people who do not believe you or should you not "feed the trolls"?
Thank you in anticipation.
1. I think that depends on your condition, whether you're getting better, staying the same, or getting worse. Probably only the first one might mean you're no longer terminal.
2. Absolutely not - you told the truth about your prognosis even if you beat the odds.
3. I'm not sure about that. My inclination would be to agree with others here and say "f*** them."
I totally understand feeling like a fake for not appearing to be sicker. I feel that way about my disabilities - since they aren't physical or visibly obvious to others, people tend not to take me seriously about them, and I start feeling guilty and wondering if maybe they're right and I'm just weak. But you're not faking or lying when you tell people you have a terminal illness - you're just telling them what your doctors have told you. There are plenty of terminal conditions where someone doesn't look all that sick right up until the very end - you're far from the only person who's been told their condition is terminal who can still live a pretty much normal life in the meantime. Please don't let it keep you from enjoying the time you have left while you're able.
_________________
Yet in my new wildness and freedom I almost welcome the bitterness of alienage. For although nepenthe has calmed me, I know always that I am an outsider; a stranger in this century and among those who are still men.
-H. P. Lovecraft, "The Outsider"