Vexcalibur wrote:
It takes a while. That means that even if the basis for Astrology were true, it is not correct right now and it will take them "a while" to update. Where "a while" may be 5 years. Not to mention, what will happen when they find another celestial body?
It's a work in progress, just like everything else. Everything is in motion. Even ideas about science change.
Quote:
And also, it is not necessary for me to use that argument to disprove Astrology.
No, it's not necessary, unless you claim that astrology is not valid, in which case you will.
Quote:
You will need an argument to prove Astrology true.
No. We don't need an argument to prove astrology true to have a thread about astrology.
Quote:
Do you have evidence for the claims of Astrology?
No. I keep saying that.
Quote:
Do you know the biological process in which planets and stars influence not only our personalities but our future?
No
Quote:
Do you have evidence that the calculations Astrologers use are correct?
No
Quote:
Are you sure that they interpreting a "quadrature " as something is not based on complete guesses some astrologer made up a long ago?
What's a quadrature?
Quote:
Or the fact that Venus is supposed to have a different effect than Mars, what is the basis for that theory?
I don't know. Something I'd like to find out.
Quote:
Is there a basis at all? Do you have evidence that Astrology has been ever used to predict anything accurately?
I would not make any claims about predictive astrology. At best, I think it can point to trends.
_________________
Not currently a moderator