Does it upset you when ill people reproduce?

Page 5 of 6 [ 86 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Spazzergasm
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,415
Location: Maine

30 Apr 2010, 1:18 pm

Blindspot149 wrote:
I have sometimes wondered, only as a mind game, what the world would be like if reproduction was subject to the same screening as adoption 8O


A lot of vasectomies...



JCpatriots
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 19 Apr 2010
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 249
Location: Massachusetts.

30 Apr 2010, 1:45 pm

No, it doesn't upset me to see ill people reproduce. Sure, it would be nice if more people adopted, but I can understand why people want to have their own blood children. You can't really say to people they can't reproduce because of an illness, because that's discriminatory and not fair to them.



mechanicalgirl39
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2009
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,340

30 Apr 2010, 6:34 pm

CockneyRebel wrote:
I think that every person on this planet should procreate.


I would rather be dead, or horrifically mutilated.

I don't fully identify as a female, and certainly not as a baby machine.


_________________
'You're so cold, but you feel alive
Lay your hands on me, one last time' (Breaking Benjamin)


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

30 Apr 2010, 6:45 pm

mechanicalgirl39 wrote:
CockneyRebel wrote:
I think that every person on this planet should procreate.


I would rather be dead, or horrifically mutilated.

I don't fully identify as a female, and certainly not as a baby machine.


Perhaps what CockneyRebel meant was more along the lines of,

"I think that every person on this planet should have a right to procreate."

Or perhaps that's ambiguous too, ... more along the lines of not having the government controlling the reproduction of the populace. But rather letting each couple decide on their own about whether they want a child, instead of having the government getting involved where it should not be.



psychohist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,623
Location: Somerville, MA, USA

30 Apr 2010, 8:10 pm

Spazzergasm wrote:
There's this girl at my bible study. She is not a very healthy person. She almost died as a baby because of a defective heart or something, and she is pre-diabetic, and has a crooked spine, and several other things I can't remember. And she has bloodless, slightly sallow skin, not very attractive, and a body shape which suggests she's less-than-healthful.

To be honest, none of these things sound genetic. In fact, most of them sound like likely results of nutritional deficiencies.

I don't have any problems with anyone having kids as long as they can afford them. If the kids are going to become a burden on others, then I'd prefer they not have them.



LK
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 13 Sep 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 137
Location: Texas, near Houston

30 Apr 2010, 11:50 pm

Spazzergasm wrote:
There's this girl at my bible study. She is not a very healthy person. She almost died as a baby because of a defective heart or something, and she is pre-diabetic, and has a crooked spine, and several other things I can't remember. And she has bloodless, slightly sallow skin, not very attractive, and a body shape which suggests she's less-than-healthful.
I'm not trying to be mean or anything. Like really. Just everything about this girl breathes unhealthy genetics. And bad genes run in her family from both sides. Anyways, she was telling us during bible study about how her one aunt (also with a host of illnesses, worse than hers) had been trying to get pregnant for the longest time, and finally did. She was happy about this news!
I felt like yelling at her, and asking her if she really thought that was something to be glad about. Now, despite mother nature yelling at her to stop trying, this woman is going to bring a baby into the world who will most certainly have a plethora of health problems. And now it will have to undergo extra drama during its life, extra worries, and extra costs for medications and treatments.

I know this probably sounds terribly harsh, but it is true if you think about it. How would you have reacted?
I don't mean to offend anyone. I don't think it's bad that they exist or anything, but they should have at least thought about how it would affect their baby before getting pregnant. It seems like selfish thinking. It for some reason just really pissed me off when this girl told us about that. I practically had to force myself from making any comments.


People do think feeling that way is harsh, but I agree with you. If a person has one, let alone a plethora of medical conditions that can be passed down to their offspring or if they have a disorder that is likely to greatly shorten their life, that they are fully aware of, it seems very selfish to me for them to reproduce. If a person really want a child and are capable of caring for one, there are many children who would love to be adopted.

I actually have an autoimmune disorder and such disorders run in my family. Shortly after being diagnosed with the disease I decided I would never have children if for no other reason than my medical condition.


_________________
While Mr. Kim... has fallen prey to the inexplicable need for human contact, let me step in and assure you that my research will go on uninterrupted, and that social relationships will continue to baffle and repulse me.
- Dr. Sheldon Cooper (TBBT)


persian85033
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2009
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,869
Location: Phoenix

01 May 2010, 9:24 pm

Spazzergasm wrote:
persian85033 wrote:
But this precise topic is one of the things I love most about Spacer culture.


What's spacer culture?


Spacers were the first humans to emigrate from Earth and colonize the 50 Spacer Worlds in Asimov's Foundation universe. They practiced strict population control to maintain a high standard of living on their planets, and especially on Solaria, the babies were 'screened' for any kind of illness. If for some reason someone developed something like any metabolic disorders or anything on Solaria, if they're married, the mariage would be, like annulled, and if they already had children, the fetologist would have to find the children at the baby farm, and Gladia didn't say, but I guess they would be euthanized.


_________________
"Of all God's creatures, there is only one that cannot be made slave of the leash. That one is the cat. If man could be crossed with the cat it would improve the man, but it would deteriorate the cat." - Mark Twain


Eggman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,676

01 May 2010, 9:58 pm

sickle cell enimia..have bth genes your screwed
have one, and malaria bearing mosquitos arnt that scary


_________________
Pwning the threads with my mad 1337 skillz.


Blindspot149
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Oct 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,516
Location: Aspergers Quadrant, INTJ, AQ 45/50

02 May 2010, 12:07 am

Spazzergasm wrote:
Blindspot149 wrote:
I have sometimes wondered, only as a mind game, what the world would be like if reproduction was subject to the same screening as adoption 8O


A lot of vasectomies...


Looking at how this has been implemented in China, I think that lots of vasectomies would be the very least thing to have to worry about :!:


_________________
Now then, tell me. What did Miggs say to you? Multiple Miggs in the next cell. He hissed at you. What did he say?


Spazzergasm
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,415
Location: Maine

02 May 2010, 9:41 am

persian85033 wrote:
Spazzergasm wrote:
persian85033 wrote:
But this precise topic is one of the things I love most about Spacer culture.


What's spacer culture?


Spacers were the first humans to emigrate from Earth and colonize the 50 Spacer Worlds in Asimov's Foundation universe. They practiced strict population control to maintain a high standard of living on their planets, and especially on Solaria, the babies were 'screened' for any kind of illness. If for some reason someone developed something like any metabolic disorders or anything on Solaria, if they're married, the mariage would be, like annulled, and if they already had children, the fetologist would have to find the children at the baby farm, and Gladia didn't say, but I guess they would be euthanized.


Ah....Eh, scary :|



Spazzergasm
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,415
Location: Maine

02 May 2010, 9:41 am

Blindspot149 wrote:
Spazzergasm wrote:
Blindspot149 wrote:
I have sometimes wondered, only as a mind game, what the world would be like if reproduction was subject to the same screening as adoption 8O


A lot of vasectomies...


Looking at how this has been implemented in China, I think that lots of vasectomies would be the very least thing to have to worry about :!:


What, did they just stop ()?



Blindspot149
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Oct 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,516
Location: Aspergers Quadrant, INTJ, AQ 45/50

02 May 2010, 12:52 pm

Spazzergasm wrote:
Blindspot149 wrote:
Spazzergasm wrote:
Blindspot149 wrote:
I have sometimes wondered, only as a mind game, what the world would be like if reproduction was subject to the same screening as adoption 8O


A lot of vasectomies...


Looking at how this has been implemented in China, I think that lots of vasectomies would be the very least thing to have to worry about :!:


What, did they just stop ()?


No, they just murdered new born babies that were girls.............. :roll:


_________________
Now then, tell me. What did Miggs say to you? Multiple Miggs in the next cell. He hissed at you. What did he say?


makuranososhi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 May 2008
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,805
Location: Banned by Alex

02 May 2010, 1:18 pm

Whether posting or quoting, watch the language. This is not the Adult Issues forum, and is not the place for such things. WP is an all ages support site; please respect that.


M.


_________________
My thanks to all the wonderful members here; I will miss the opportunity to continue to learn and work with you.

For those who seek an alternative, it is coming.

So long, and thanks for all the fish!


Spazzergasm
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,415
Location: Maine

02 May 2010, 4:15 pm

Blindspot149 wrote:
Spazzergasm wrote:
Blindspot149 wrote:
Spazzergasm wrote:
Blindspot149 wrote:
I have sometimes wondered, only as a mind game, what the world would be like if reproduction was subject to the same screening as adoption 8O


A lot of vasectomies...


Looking at how this has been implemented in China, I think that lots of vasectomies would be the very least thing to have to worry about :!:


What, did they just stop ()?


No, they just murdered new born babies that were girls.............. :roll:


Oh, right. I knew that. :S I really did. Just didn't occur to me.



MONIQUEIJ
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Oct 2009
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,353

29 Jun 2010, 12:23 pm

no i dont upset me every women should have a chance to mother a child.



DerKodeMeister
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 23 Jul 2009
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 182
Location: USA

29 Jun 2010, 1:26 pm

ZEGH8578 wrote:
the world is overpopulated PERIOD. PERIOD. PERIOD

not only should reproduction no longer be a right, it should be severely restricted across the globe, across cultures and social status.
it should be as close to banned altogether as possible. its the only logical solution, but we ignore it as much as we can.


Avarice wrote:
CockneyRebel wrote:
I think that every person on this planet should procreate.


You're the opposite to me, I think every person on the planet should stop reproducing. We already have 6 billion people, let's not make it 9 billion.


I'm sorry, I really don't want to sound cold or mean or inhumane or whatever you guys want to say but, QFT. There's too many people in the world, humans really don't play much of an important positive role in our environment; we have nothing to offer for this world. We are unnecessary IMO, which is (one way of thinking about) why nature allows us to ignore many of its rules.

You can delve on ethics all you want, but the biological purpose of reproduction, of survival of the fittest etc, is to further the genetic quality of a species, not to recede it. Line drawing has been and will always be a problem for ethical issues, but if you think about this from a biological perspective you might better see it from the other side.

What I'm really trying to get at is, yes very well a government should not have a say in who can and cannot procreate; everyone should have that right. But realize that there is a growing problem genetically and quantitatively with our species, and (I know this is hard to do) separate that thought entirely from humanity. Don't think about the issues that humans create, don't think about humanized "solutions", just realize that humans are overpopulating this planet, and that there is something very odd about human nature that lets us consciously bypass many of the "rules" of nature.

I don't know nearly enough to give an exact reasoning for this, and perhaps my opinion is misguided or wrong entirely. However these types of things have fascinated me since I was very young, and I haven't yet met someone who could go deeply in to this. If you have any thoughts, feel free to PM me.


_________________
If all mankind were to disappear, the world would regenerate back to the rich state of equilibrium that existed ten thousand years ago. If insects were to vanish, the environment would collapse into chaos.
-E.O. Wilson


Last edited by DerKodeMeister on 29 Jun 2010, 2:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.