PrncssAlay wrote:
b9 wrote:
[what weeds? what is wrong with weeds?. it is only humans that can think of plants as weeds ? i think maybe you are saying something more important than i initially interpreted.
When someone says anything about "going too far into the weeds," that means basically overwhelming them with detailed explanations of something that is probably way over their head anyway.
i googled the phrase "going too far into the weeds' and i found no reference to your usage of the term (also, you should have placed the comma outside of the quotation marks).
as far as assuming that what i say may go "over someone's head" is concerned, i do not think they are too stupid to understand. i am elsewise disappointed at my inability to communicate what i find easy to understand adequately.
nothing is difficult to conceive if one views it from a certain perspective. if i find that perspective, and i suddenly understand a great deal about what i am interrogating, i should be able to relate what i have found using the same simple perspective with which i viewed it in order to understand it.
the smartest people are the ones that can enlighten the uninspired with very simple descriptions of the underlying details of the world in which they live.
i never look down on anyone. if what i say "goes over their head", then i was incorrect in my communicative trajectory.
it does not matter how intelligent a being (any animal) is. their reality of experienced existence is as colorful and as complete as any human regardless of their intelligence.
"smart" means nothing when compared to complexity of the entirety of existence.