Bethie
Veteran
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,817
Location: My World, Highview, Louisville, Kentucky, USA, Earth, The Milky Way, Local Group, Local Supercluster
16 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
16 Apr 2011, 4:21 am
16 Apr 2011, 5:47 am
16 Apr 2011, 11:30 am
IdahoRose wrote:
Janissy wrote:
How dare those people not conform to social norms. Aren't they aware they should be dressing in very narrowly approved ways?
Nobody else sees the irony of this thread on WrongPlanet?
Ok, fine.
Nobody else sees the irony of this thread on WrongPlanet?
Ok, fine.
Just because we're autistic doesn't mean we have to be accepting of everything people do.
Yeah exactly
And duh, wearing your jeans down past your butt is a very social norm now. But its not that, that bothers me the most. I think it can be unhygenic, and just generally disgusting.
16 Apr 2011, 11:32 am
16 Apr 2011, 11:33 am
TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
squonk wrote:
TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
I don't have a problem with it. I'm free to think you're a moron that can't dress themselves, but those dudes aren't showing any more than women do.
So I would agree because I can never understand why the women do it. There are plenty who go around town with low jeans or trousers and are constantly pulling them up or their top further down in case their underwear has shown which of course it has, somewhat repeatedly. Then I wondered if men did this purposely, did women too.
Those that do this with their pants generally wear boxers and don't show actual underwear. So, the indecency argument is really moot.
Boxers are underwear, aren't they? I can see the dictionary isn't your friend
16 Apr 2011, 11:35 am
sluice wrote:
What about fat girls with their bellies hanging out from their bare mid-riff top? I don't even see low hanging jeans that often anymore though I could be off in my own little world. 
Yeah, thats equally disgusting. It wouldn't be so bad if they had something to flaunt.
16 Apr 2011, 11:44 am
16 Apr 2011, 11:46 am
benjimanbreeg wrote:
TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
squonk wrote:
TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
I don't have a problem with it. I'm free to think you're a moron that can't dress themselves, but those dudes aren't showing any more than women do.
So I would agree because I can never understand why the women do it. There are plenty who go around town with low jeans or trousers and are constantly pulling them up or their top further down in case their underwear has shown which of course it has, somewhat repeatedly. Then I wondered if men did this purposely, did women too.
Those that do this with their pants generally wear boxers and don't show actual underwear. So, the indecency argument is really moot.
Boxers are underwear, aren't they? I can see the dictionary isn't your friend
Ouch. That hurt.
Wait... no it didn't.
Perhaps you should become more familiar with the different types of boxers on the market before you call them all underwear.
16 Apr 2011, 11:47 am
16 Apr 2011, 11:52 am
TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
benjimanbreeg wrote:
TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
squonk wrote:
TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
I don't have a problem with it. I'm free to think you're a moron that can't dress themselves, but those dudes aren't showing any more than women do.
So I would agree because I can never understand why the women do it. There are plenty who go around town with low jeans or trousers and are constantly pulling them up or their top further down in case their underwear has shown which of course it has, somewhat repeatedly. Then I wondered if men did this purposely, did women too.
Those that do this with their pants generally wear boxers and don't show actual underwear. So, the indecency argument is really moot.
Boxers are underwear, aren't they? I can see the dictionary isn't your friend
Ouch. That hurt.
Wait... no it didn't.
Perhaps you should become more familiar with the different types of boxers on the market before you call them all underwear.
I don't really pay as much attention to male boxers as you. I like calvin's though
16 Apr 2011, 11:58 am
16 Apr 2011, 12:32 pm
16 Apr 2011, 12:42 pm
benjimanbreeg wrote:
TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
squonk wrote:
TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
I don't have a problem with it. I'm free to think you're a moron that can't dress themselves, but those dudes aren't showing any more than women do.
So I would agree because I can never understand why the women do it. There are plenty who go around town with low jeans or trousers and are constantly pulling them up or their top further down in case their underwear has shown which of course it has, somewhat repeatedly. Then I wondered if men did this purposely, did women too.
Those that do this with their pants generally wear boxers and don't show actual underwear. So, the indecency argument is really moot.
Boxers are underwear, aren't they? I can see the dictionary isn't your friend
Yes I didn't notice that Freudian slip LOL slips also being underwear!
16 Apr 2011, 12:47 pm
16 Apr 2011, 12:51 pm
