What if everyone had their gender/sex switched overnight?

Post Reply New Topic

OMG, for the SECOND time t'day you've got me RTFL!! LOLOLOLOL You're a MESS!! (wink)

The US would have their first woman resident without there being an election.

I've often wondered the same thing. Same with gay people, as well----NOT that I dislike EITHER people----but, I have often wondered if gay people are with their own sex, mainly cuz they feel the most comfortable; and/or, like, if they are male and had a disapproving father (like, their father sorta snubbed them, cuz they were "weird"), they, subconsciously, wanted to find a male they could please (same with women - I've known gay women whom I thought felt that way).

Last edited by Campin_Cat on 17 Mar 2018, 8:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

I would have trouble walking with my new wider hips, lol.

I have NOT read this whole thread----but, the responses I DID read, were GREAT!!

To answer the title question: I want NOTHIN' to do with changin' my gender/sex----even if it would be temporary, cuz what if I couldn't change back? I would lose my friggin' mind----I've worked so hard to get-along as the person that I AM, I wouldn't want to start all over, learnin'! !

I will also start playing with your boobs immediately.

There would be men's marches all across America on each anniversary date of Donna Trump's inogeration.

The Kinks would be The Tarts.

most people are worried in using things designer for other gender in public – it's a bit of a weird thing. i have a feel shirts from the masculine session, they are nice. h&m have some longer models that are super fine to use as a dress. male clothes tend to be cheaper too.

Let's be real: there would be a lot of sexual activity, rather solo or with a partner. Possibly recordbreaking levels of fornication. Probably can't say much more outside of the mature board.

Awesome!!

Anecdotally speaking, I would disagree.



I rather dislike this reasoning because it’s the kind that conversion therapists use to justify the treatments they inflict. The whole “overbearing mother, distant father” hypothesis has been going for a while.

Conversion therapy is just downright cruel, and it saddens me that it still goes on. Not only is it mentally damaging, but it also often involves physical torture.

Also, this reasoning generally rubs me the wrong way, because it suggests that we all must’ve come from bad homes and are just psychologically broken straight people.

When in actual fact, gay and bi people come from all sorts of homes, some have a great connection with both their mother and their father.

I read a Cracked article where they interviewed someone who had experienced conversion therapy, and he talked about what happened during that time.

His therapist at the conversion camp asked him what his relationship was like with his parents, so he told them how he got on fairly well with both his mother and father, the therapist concluded that he must be so traumatised that he is suppressing memories of trauma.

http://www.cracked.com/personal-experie ... -camp.html

In those situations, you can’t win. Your mother was overbearing/distant? She is to blame. Your father was? He’s clearly the cause. Both your parents were wonderful, and you couldn’t wish for a better upbringing? Suppressed trauma, of course.

There’s no answer you can give which they won’t twist to fit their view.

Hence why I question the validity of it all, if it’s so flexible then can it really be considered credible?

Also, what about all the scientific research into epigenetics and hormones playing a part in sexual orientation?


-Finger digit ratio theory

(https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyl ... -about-you

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... 6916304044),

-Multiple brothers (in right-handed brothers, they found that in large families the more brothers a boy had, there was a significant correlation with an increased chance of homosexuality.

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2017-12- ... exual.html

Interestingly the same cannot be said for left-handed brothers, however left-handedness in general has a higher occurrence rate amongst LGBT individuals- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12710825)

-Also, identical twin studies (When one twin is gay, the other has a 20% chance of being gay suggesting epigenetics play a role, epigenetics are genes which can be turned on or off by environmental and hormonal factors that occur outside of the womb) https://www.nature.com/news/epigenetic- ... en-1.18530

-Or the hyper-sexual heterosexual concept (in families with gay men, studies found that straight women were more likely to be promiscuous, have a higher sex drive, and produce more children…implying a benefit to the females of the family and male homosexuality occurring as an unintended by-product, and vice versa for lesbians).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6p1nmOnILA (More references available in the video description on YouTube).

Haha, sorry for the long post- you just touched upon a strong interest of mine.

I love learning about genetics and psychology. Sorry if I got any information wrong, feel free to correct me if this is the case.

Granted, all of this is going off the thread topic but this post grabbed my interest, sorry OP.

Yep, there's a couple of things that I buy, that are men's, for that very reason. One is 100 percent cotton shirts----LOVE them, but one is hard-pressed finding them in the women's section. The other thing is, I used to like to wear tie-up penny loafers ("dockers" I think they were called, back-in-the-day), because I didn't like where the tongue came-to on my foot, in the women's shoe. You gotta LOVE our sensory issues, huh? LOL

I live in Canada.

Some interesting information there Lost_dragon!

Thanks.