What is currently legal but you think should be illegal?

Page 7 of 10 [ 153 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

18 Apr 2011, 1:02 am

League_Girl wrote:
And if alcohol became illegal, people would still make it and sell it to others. That is what happened in the 1920's when alcohol was illegal. People illegally made it and sold it.


Alcohol left the arena of legitimate distribution and taxation and was a gift to organised crime. I really don't want to see those prohibitionist days here in the UK.

Which is why the likes of Alcohol Concern must have their funding removed. Not because they'll bring those days about, but because they'll make life increasingly unpleasant for drinkers.



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

18 Apr 2011, 2:30 am

jamieboy wrote:
Tax avoidance is currently legal. I'd criminalize it.


So you don't think people should be able to find legal ways to pay less tax?



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

18 Apr 2011, 2:31 am

Bloodheart wrote:
The more posts I see from you Tequila the more I like you :)


Thanks for the compliment. :)



AceOfSpades
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,754
Location: Sean Penn, Cambodia

19 Apr 2011, 3:23 am

Dox47 wrote:
Minding other people's business.

That being said, civil forfeitures should not be legal. I could come up with a whole list of things it should not be legal for the state to do, but there are very few areas I can think of for the private citizen that need more rather than less legal restrictions.

@Vigilans: What's the problem with hollow point ammunition? You do know that the police use it because it's less likely to injure innocent bystanders due to ricochets and over-penetration, right?
Vigilans? Seriously? I thought you would know better than that. Hollow points are much better than FMJ's. Bullets do not instantly drop people. There is no guaranteed number of times you can shoot someone til they're no longer a threat. Generally the only effective way of stopping someone is shooting at the head or at vital organs. Hollow points expand into the body so that it dumps more energy into the target, generating more shock and tissue damage in its path. This means it is more effective at stopping someone than an FMJ. FMJ's just go through you so you would either have to have a really good aim and actually hit vital organs or the brain stem or you would have to give the target more holes to bleed out of. Also the shock that hollow points generate are very effective for severing arteries.



namaste
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,365
Location: Hindustan

19 Apr 2011, 3:52 am

Alcohol
wreaks so many families



MasterJedi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Oct 2010
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,160
Location: in an open field west of a white house

19 Apr 2011, 7:43 am

it should be illegal for the government to interfere in the lives of their constituents.

For example, if I wanted to drop LSD or smoke a joint in front of a cop, I should have that right.

The police should be the first responders to accidents and shootings and stuff, NOT to tell people what to do and not what to do.


_________________
That is my spot, in an ever changing world, it is a single point of consistency. If my life were expressed as a function on a four dimensional Cartesian coordinate system, that spot, from the moment I first sat on it, would be 0-0-0-0.


stgiordanobruno
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 18 Nov 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 117

19 Apr 2011, 8:33 am

Here is Australia I would say travelling greater than 20 KPH (12 MPH) below the speed limit on open country roads should definitely be illegal, they cause more accidents than just about every one else as they frustrate drivers who have to wait on windy country roads before they can safely pass.



darkphantomx
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jan 2015
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 52

30 Jan 2015, 5:07 pm

-Women who don't shave their legs or armpits.

-Screamo music

-Wearing striped shirts and plaid shorts together.

-Making twerking videos. Especially male twerking videos.



mr_bigmouth_502
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Dec 2013
Age: 32
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 7,028
Location: Alberta, Canada

30 Jan 2015, 6:41 pm

There aren't very many things I would personally make illegal, as I have a fairly libertarian view on most things, but I would ban predatory, unfair, and exploitative business practices, things like hidden fees, misleading advertisements, and obscuring important information with fine print. I would also ban patent trolling, which is when a company patents a fairly common feature of one of their products just so that they can compete unfairly.



lostonearth35
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jan 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,884
Location: On a planet where I don't belong.

30 Jan 2015, 6:54 pm

Oh man, where to BEGIN?

Tobacco, alcohol, public places that allow screeching bratty children, stupidity, obnoxiousness, bullying, bad movies, bad TV shows, bad advertisements, reality shows, pit bulls, paparazzi, racism, sexism, telemarketers, anti-vacs, religion.

Of course making something illegal doesn't mean people won't still do it. They don't care that it's wrong. They internally justify their crimes, like shoplifting - "Oh, the stores rip us off with their high prices", "It's not like I killed somebody", "It doesn't cost much anyway" - and if they're caught they're only sorry that they didn't get away with it.

Although I heard in some places it's not considered a crime to steal food if you're literally starving and too poor to buy. There are people in Canada and the US who go without food, which is hard to believe because you're always hearing how fat and disgusting we all are. :?



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

31 Jan 2015, 3:21 am

chrissyrun wrote:
@ Tequila
I know that they shouldn't control your lives, but people don't understand the side effects of it.
They take it and the majority of them have really extreme reactions.
There is no warning, the label just says "do not smoke this", because people really pay attention to labels.
Somebody should be the warning voice.
It's not like putting a tax on sugar or potato chips.
There is less of a chance that you will die from that than from this drug.
It is HARMFUL, and people need to know that.
Tell me what you would do, or do you not care if they DIE and go through seizures, paranoia, extreme fatigue, and utter sickness from this underground( meaning not well known) drug?


I do not get how anyone old enough to go into a store that would sell such things...could possibly not know that stuff is dangerous, or at the very least has possible risks. People really can be stupid, but making it illegal probably would not help if there is still demand it will just be created/sold illegally and people who end up using it will just face legal prosecution on top of any damage the substance might do to them. It would make more sense to spread awareness about the dangers and legalize weed nation wide since there are quite a few people who settle for that since weed is illegal who'd probably just smoke weed if there wasn't the risk of legal penalties...or if they are trying to get a job and don't want to fail a test they might switch to that.


_________________
Tis the time to melt the Ice.


Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

31 Jan 2015, 3:29 am

CockneyRebel wrote:
Energy drinks.


That would be terrible :( ...suppose there would still be tea and coffee....but sometimes that just doesn't cut it, I'd miss energy drinks if they where illegal.


_________________
Tis the time to melt the Ice.


eric76
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,660
Location: In the heart of the dust bowl

31 Jan 2015, 3:34 am

It ought to be illegal for Congresscritters to exempt themselves from laws that everyone else must follow. For example, members of Congress reportedly can legally trade on information learned as a result of them performing their Congressional duties.



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

31 Jan 2015, 3:38 am

darkphantomx wrote:
-Women who don't shave their legs or armpits.

-Screamo music

-Wearing striped shirts and plaid shorts together.

-Making twerking videos. Especially male twerking videos.


I almost agree with the last 3....As for the first one why should it be up to the government what one does with the hair on their body? That is far too invasive, how about they make it illegal for guys not to shave their face.


_________________
Tis the time to melt the Ice.


mr_bigmouth_502
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Dec 2013
Age: 32
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 7,028
Location: Alberta, Canada

31 Jan 2015, 3:43 am

Sweetleaf wrote:
CockneyRebel wrote:
Energy drinks.


That would be terrible :( ...suppose there would still be tea and coffee....but sometimes that just doesn't cut it, I'd miss energy drinks if they where illegal.


Energy drinks containing taurine used to be illegal in Canada, then they got approved through a clever loophole sometime around 2005, but when Health Canada finally caught on in 2013, they decided to cap the amount of caffeine they were allowed to legally contain.

NOS used to have 250mg of caffeine in a 473ml can here, then the makers reduced it to 190 in 2011, then it was again reduced to what I presume is the legal maximum of 170mg in 2013, making it not much stronger than Monster. Around that time, NOS also discontinued its 650ml bottles in Canada, presumably because a 650ml container isn't large enough to count as more than one serving, and it would have too much caffeine in one container to be legal even with the new, weak formulation.

Monster also made the formula they put in the larger 710ml cans stupidly weak compared to the normal size cans, because a container has to be at least 750ml to count as more than one serving.

Strangely, energy shots aren't as regulated, probably because they're not as attractive to younger consumers.

I used to love energy drinks, and they were a HUGE special interest of mine at one time, but I found that they exacerbate my anxiety too much and make me really fidgety, so I mainly stick to coffee and tea nowadays. I'll drink the occasional energy drink if I need more of a boost though.

eric76 wrote:
It ought to be illegal for Congresscritters to exempt themselves from laws that everyone else must follow. For example, members of Congress reportedly can legally trade on information learned as a result of them performing their Congressional duties.


Amen. The authorities should have to follow the exact same rules civilians follow. I'm sick of politicians, police, and other people in positions of authority abusing their power.



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

31 Jan 2015, 12:41 pm

lostonearth35 wrote:
pit bulls


Why? :(


_________________
Tis the time to melt the Ice.