Which Ackman do you prefer?

Post Reply New Topic

The Creedonian one, or the non-creedonian one?

I prefer the Creedonian one. This is the one that I know and love.

The non-delusional one who doesn't spam us with his hallucinations.

does being mean make you feel like a big man??

Is that aimed at me? If so, why?

This Credonia s**t sure ain't healthy, and the posts Ackman make about it often verge on breaking the rules. In fact, I've seen loads of them which are a blatant breach of the WP rules. I'm amazed he hasen't been banned yet. He must give a Credonian tax break to the mods or something

Here's a post of his I happened to find just now in a thread I was checking: "When I was married for the first time, I had to show her what marijuana was. She loved it. She doesn't show it to her children though, especially that autistic f**** that is her youngest."

Why are you supporting posts like this?

I have a feeling where this thread is heading towards.

Do you like the Kinks CockneyRebel who truly likes the 60s, or the Sid CockneyRebel who pretends to like the 70s?

Sorry about the above post. I was just making a point that it's better to be who you really are, instead of trying to please the masses.

I was under the impression Creedonia was a fictional world that happened to be created by Ackman and also happened to develop into a special interest for him. If his obsession was LOTR and Middle Earth I wouldn't see any difference. As far as I'm concerned his Creedonia posts are just creative writing and he uses WP as his typepad.

Creedonian Ackman is fine!

well i do not want to offend anyone, but i also do not want to be suppressed in saying a few things that i think.

the creedonian stuff (which has the potential to be developed into something big), is reasonably interesting, although you post only unconnected and isolated paragraphs concerning it. it would be better to somehow compose a "serial" that you release episodes of in your post procession. you could have an avid audience if you had a whole novel in reserve and released single paragraphs every day that had a continuity of developing storyline.

on an other note, i see things you post that are confusing to me. an example is a video of yourself where you were smoking a cigarette. you did not inhale the smoke, and i was confused as to why you bother to smoke if you do not inhale. in another post, you said something like you were hanging for a cigarette, and i wondered how you could be addicted to them if you do not inhale the smoke.

another example was when you were posting something about your girlfriend, and i was not aware you had one because you never spoke of her before that post or again after (as far as i know).

i do think your representation of the early 1900's is very authentic and your words sometimes sound as if they were written in that time.

Non-creedionian. Or stick with the creedonian, but don't keep on about it because as you can see it's pissing people off.

I'm supporting it because it's ART and FICTION and NOT REAL LIFE it's an INTERPRETATION OF LIFE. He's describing how some people think of Autistic Children. If you don't like it, don't read it. It's that simple Asp-Z.

This is really NOT necessary Asp-Z, there is NO reason to write about Ackman like that. Writing about Creedonia does NOT make him delusional. It's his creation NOT his hallucination. What reason do you have for attacking him like that?

He could just alternatively write the Creedon stories in a blog? Easier than getting into a pickle about it?

That's what I'm thinking actually.

HE MADE a THREAD saying he was GIVEN DRUGS by the DOCTOR to get rid of IT BUT HE DIDN'T TAKE THEM. THAT ISN'T healthy.



It's HARD TO NOT READ when it's ALL over THE FORUM. He SPAMS HIS CRAP everywhere.

MAKING random WORDS CAPS is ANNOYING.