Do you hate these kinds of scumbags? *Rant*

Page 1 of 1 [ 6 posts ] 


Do you have a problem with these people?
Yes. Always. 14%  14%  [ 1 ]
Yes. A bit. 14%  14%  [ 1 ]
No. Never, not even a little bit. 29%  29%  [ 2 ]
Indifferent. 29%  29%  [ 2 ]
I never noticed this, but now you say it, yes, it is pretty annoying when you do notice it. 14%  14%  [ 1 ]
I never noticed this. No, I don't have a problem at all. 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
I never noticed this. Indifferent. 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Total votes : 7

Liveirarica
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 10 Oct 2014
Age: 72
Gender: Male
Posts: 90

12 Oct 2014, 12:18 pm

I call these people I am talking about for scumbags (and other name-callings), because that is what they are;

I hate these condescending, arrogant, pompous, self-important people who, when in debates, are using extreme denotation, deny the existence of colloquial speech, by-the-dictionary or 'robot' definitions.

Also reject connotation and use denotation because they're insecure, who believes themselves to be superior and acting condescending by using denotation to make themselves look 'smart' and then feel good about themselves, even if it is only making them look like utter idiots because they are using it in a wrong and ridiculous way as if they were robots. Also, when they are debating, they are not doing it because they stand by their standpoints and like to defend their standpoints, but do it for the sake of "not losing the debate" (because if they don't reply, it is their way to say "I surrender and accept the humiliating defeat" and what they think the other poster believes too) and to 'prove' themselves to be 'right' as they cannot accept or admit themselves to be wrong when they are wrong on small points when they are being corrected on a mistake. And if you don't give out the 'perfect response' they will keep tease you for it and make you look 'stupid', those are the real stupid people, who have deluded themselves to believe that they are "intellectuals", and who take everything literally to the letter, discuss semantics rather than the actual topic and call you for an illiterate for using connotation and 'misusing' the word, and make entire arguments on that if someone used 'this' word instead of 'that' word in his, hers or its speech, that stupid person will deny on that the 'this' word is even remotely close to 'that' and because they didn't use specifically and correctly 'that' word, it didn't happen at all for those people, as 'interpretation' or even allegorical comments don't even exist for those imbeciles.

While I do admit there are a bit fault into both parts in this one, I do still believe that there are more wrong into those I hate as they, instead of correcting one, will instead insult and berate the person who did the mistake, which I believe is too exaggerated as it was simply that, a mistake, not ignorance as the scumbags believe, what this ado was about is; when they belittle a person for his wrong choice of words, for example using the term 'racist' instead of 'prejudice' or 'bigot' and because of that reason alone, they believe his, hers or its whole argument has been dismissed for that one mistake of his, hers or its, as if it wasn't obvious what the person meant.

Do not misunderstand me, I do not mean when the average is criticizing the spelling or grammar of people who are too careless, use extreme slang that it become just a whole comment with non-existing words, abbreviations and acronyms for almost every long word, using one-liners instead of some opinion where he/she/it used the mind for once, and intentional spelling mistakes ('u' instead of 'you', how hard is it to spend 1 second on typing the two words before?), and are never up for a debate or when discussing, using jokes for arguments instead of actual arguments, that it makes it hard to discuss with the idiot and I will end up stop bothering with them, those people deserve the hate they get, but I am not talking about those who use slang that should be forgiven (they should not), I am talking about people who use colloquial speech and connotation that should be forgiven.

Tell me are you in favor of people saying "I. Am. Going. To Open. The. Door. And. Walk. Out. Of. My. Room. Then. Take. My. Shoes. On. And. Then. Take. My. Jacket. On. And. Then. I. Will. Open. The. Door. And. Go. Out. Of. My. Home, I. Will, Then. Take. My. Car. Keys. Out. Of. My. Pocket. And. Then. Open. The. Door. And. Then. Sit. In. My Seat. Close. The. Door. And. Start. To. Drive. To. Right. Then. Left. Then. Straight. Forwards. For. 20 km. Then. Drive. To. Right. Then. Drive. To. Left. Then. Drive. Into. The. Parking. Lot. Find. A. Free. Place. To. Park. Then. Park. Then. Open. The. Door. And. Then. I. Arrived. To. The. Kindergarten. To. Take. My. Children. Home..." than "I took the kids back home from kindergarten"? That is my point, I hate those people who say the former rather than the latter, they are talking like robots, it's annoying and while it might be true that it is more correct and definitive and consistent reading, but everyone knows what you are talking about if you just drop the ado and get directly to the case without further fuss that we don't care to hear about, why don't you just do that instead? That's my point.

These incompetent scumbags are simply dreadful.

What is your opinion on them? Is it me who just over-think on these people and have too much of a history with them, or is this common for you too? Discuss.



Last edited by Liveirarica on 12 Oct 2014, 4:30 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Kiprobalhato
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2014
Age: 29
Gender: Female
Posts: 29,119
Location: מתחת לעננים

12 Oct 2014, 3:15 pm

it's a lot easier to use "intellectual" speech on the internet than face to face, where you have much more time to form a response and are separated by a screen.

while correct usage of denotation and colloquialisms is not completely unimportant, when someone constantly points it out instead of refuting the central argument, it's grasping at straws and a sign that they are losing, akin to most ad hominem attacks.


_________________
הייתי צוללת עכשיו למים
הכי, הכי עמוקים
לא לשמוע כלום
לא לדעת כלום
וזה הכל אהובי, זה הכל.


Liveirarica
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 10 Oct 2014
Age: 72
Gender: Male
Posts: 90

12 Oct 2014, 4:42 pm

Kiprobalhato wrote:
it's a lot easier to use "intellectual" speech on the internet than face to face, where you have much more time to form a response and are separated by a screen.
Agreed. I am also mainly talking about those people here on the Internet and not in real life, those people simply do not exist in the real world, they will be looked down at as some arrogant and condescending idiot, while on the Internet he would be considered for an individual of high intellect and one you should refrain from replying to without wanting to be humiliating yourself by one of his witty responses against you, "pointing your stupidity".
Quote:
while correct usage of denotation and colloquialisms is not completely unimportant, when someone constantly points it out instead of refuting the central argument, it's grasping at straws and a sign that they are losing, akin to most ad hominem attacks
Seconded.



mezzanotte
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Apr 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,506
Location: Washington, D.C.

12 Oct 2014, 7:00 pm

The purpose of discussions isn't to win or lose, it's to learn more about topics through the exchange of ideas.

Instead of being offended by inflammatory posts, just leave them be and move on to other discussions. It's a more productive use of your time.



Liveirarica
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 10 Oct 2014
Age: 72
Gender: Male
Posts: 90

13 Oct 2014, 4:13 am

mezzanotte wrote:
The purpose of discussions isn't to win or lose, it's to learn more about topics through the exchange of ideas.
I agree, but these people believes it to be only that, debating for defending themselves rather their opinions and standpoints, and act cocky while doing it, they feel a reply is a personal attack, and if they don't reply back they would think that they have 'lost' and the other person have 'won', which is the only reasons why they actively keep the debate alive.
Quote:
Instead of being offended by inflammatory posts, just leave them be and move on to other discussions. It's a more productive use of your time.
That's what I am doing now, there have just been too many of the same kinds in where I have been lately on the Internet, the only reason that I have given them time is to study them.



Dillogic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Nov 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,339

13 Oct 2014, 6:23 am

Doesn't matter how dumb someone can make right sound, or how smart someone can make wrong sound; it just doesn't matter.