Page 1 of 1 [ 5 posts ] 


Too casual for a wedding?
Yes 100%  100%  [ 5 ]
No 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Total votes : 5

androbot01
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,746
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada

13 Feb 2015, 3:44 pm

Image

Image

Image

link

If I was in a warm climate I'd consider it.



Amity
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,714
Location: Meandering

13 Feb 2015, 5:08 pm

The images of bridal shorts reminded me of this dress, but it probably costs a bit more at £16,000 :jester:

Image

Shorts? Why not, its the brides choice imo.



OliveOilMom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 11,447
Location: About 50 miles past the middle of nowhere

13 Feb 2015, 5:33 pm

Trashy, tacky, and ridiculous are what I think of them. But, every bride has her own choice about what is and isn't pretty and that she wants for her wedding. I had a traditional wedding and wore a Victorian ivory dress with a long train, ivory because I had been married before. I was 22 and my colors were pastels, which was fitting. I went for the pretty and innocent look which was fitting for my age. If I were to marry again, or even have the inclination and money to renew my vows I would want a gothic wedding with a black dress with red trim, but I'd want a full skirt and a ball gown, not something figure hugging or too revealing though. I'd choose dark green and gold as my colors and we would wear hats instead of tiaras. I would have an evening ceremony and have a nuptual mass and have the church lit by candles. That is very different than the afternoon wedding I had almost 28 years ago.

I've looked through lots of wedding magazines, been to wedding stores, seen wedding shows, etc and one thing I haven't changed my taste about is that I don't much like modern dresses. I don't care for as much bows and that kind of trim anymore but I do still like something that isn't too plain. My older daughter likes simple modern plain dresses and that will be beautiful on her, but my younger daughter lives the ornate, dark things like I do even at her age. With her coloring I could so see her pulling off a black wedding dress and pulling it off great, totally rocking it.

This makes me think about the fact that I don't remember ever seeing any bridal pants suits. I wonder if they make those and why I haven't seen them. I think it would be very pretty to have some tapered pants with a long jacket that is cut like a cutaway but with a very full back instead of tails and comes out behind like the back half of a dress.


_________________
I'm giving it another shot. We will see.
My forum is still there and everyone is welcome to come join as well. There is a private women only subforum there if anyone is interested. Also, there is no CAPTCHA. ;-)

The link to the forum is http://www.rightplanet.proboards.com


nick007
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 May 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,552
Location: was Louisiana but now Vermont in capitalistic military dictatorship called USA

13 Feb 2015, 5:36 pm

I think they're alittle too revealing


_________________
"I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem!"
~King Of The Hill


"Hear all, trust nothing"
~Ferengi Rule Of Acquisition #190
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Ru ... cquisition


androbot01
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,746
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada

14 Feb 2015, 7:00 am

Your Victorian dress sounds beautiful OOM!

I found a pant suit that is quite nice.

Image

The shorts are revealing and one would want to have nice legs I think to pull it off.

I think the trending casualness of wedding attire is perhaps a reflection of the more casual attitude to marriage.