Noca wrote:
what I call cookie cutter homes, they are all just boring clones of one another
A friend of mine calls them "Lego houses". I really wish he wouldn't be so disrespectful to Lego like that!
I see the difference all around me here in Yorkshire, not just in houses, but all architecture. The stuff from the Victorian era is so beautifully put together - something as practical as railway bridge for a farmer to get his sheep across the line, that would be seen by hardly anyone, is made of beautifully dressed and fitted local stone. Even the back-to-back houses built for the mill workers have beautiful bits of hand carved masonry, and little touches of stained glass where the original doors and windows are still intact. There wouldn't be even be enough skilled craftsmen to do that these days.
People that I know that have moved into the new builds seem to have endless problems with the structure of their homes too, so it's not even as if more modern technology has resulted in any practical advantage. Folks I know in the building trade tell me that they much prefer working on the older ones too. The old Victorian terraces will outlast the new stuff where they're allowed to, in my opinion, and even after 150 years are structurally sound enough to easily retro-fit with more modern amenities where needed.
_________________
When you are fighting an invisible monster, first throw a bucket of paint over it.