06 Mar 2017, 4:23 am
has anyone else come across these monstrosities, in person or otherwise?
of course, i could not believe it when i first saw them in the mall's disney store...which was likely a good thing, as i needed the laugh. this HAS to have been an error in digitization.
dunno, it LOOKS like gary busey to me, i hope i'm not alone there. 
just not emma watson.
in general, realistic (or attempted realistic) human faces mounted on dolls don't rally do it for me. even if it were to be done, the head does seem to be just a bit too large. the forehead especially.
what do you think?
06 Mar 2017, 9:46 am
lostonearth35
Veteran
Joined: 5 Jan 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,880
Location: On a planet where I don't belong.
07 Mar 2017, 11:58 am
I don't even know who Gary Busey is. All I know is that all the dolls based on the live-action versions of Disney characters are weird and ugly, I'll take the cartoon versions any day, any time, and I can't understand why Disney keeps making live-action versions of some of their best animated movies because the live ones are 
nick007
Veteran
Joined: 4 May 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,552
Location: was Louisiana but now Vermont in capitalistic military dictatorship called USA
14 Mar 2017, 11:23 pm
17 Mar 2017, 2:22 am
yeah, the scaling i think is the biggest issue. it could have worked okay, i think, if it were sized more proportionally but this is a lost cause here. i get the impression that they used a regular doll head "base" and just printed emma's face on it. the forehead is especially colossal (seemingly), a simple reduction there can go far.
i liked the recent jungle book adaptation, i saw it with my GF and we enjoyed it. i have the original animated version on VHS in spanish, but i do not recall watching it in full, ever.
gary busey is an actor with a....unique smile.
17 Mar 2017, 12:30 pm
17 Mar 2017, 12:31 pm
