Page 1 of 1 [ 10 posts ] 

NewTime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2015
Posts: 2,131

16 Aug 2018, 7:57 pm

"Ain't" was originally a contraction of "am not". And then sometime people started using "ain't" incorrectly where it didn't contract "am not" and the word became stigmatized.



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 71
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

16 Aug 2018, 9:47 pm

That basically it.

Maybe its time for us all to "reclaim ain't".

I read once that in Cornwall in England they also contract "be" with "not" and say "b'ain't".



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,959
Location:      

17 Aug 2018, 8:31 am

Tell me 'tain't so!

:lol:


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

17 Aug 2018, 9:50 am

I believe "ain't" became substandard in Victorian days. I'll have to research the reason for this.

Just like "cockroach" was shortened to "roach" because of the sexual connotation of "cock."



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,959
Location:      

17 Aug 2018, 9:53 am

That cain't be true! While we main't use 'ain't' as it was originally used, tain't any reason not to.


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


Esmerelda Weatherwax
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Sep 2017
Age: 71
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,749

17 Aug 2018, 9:55 am

So ain't has a taint, and use it we cain't?


_________________
"I believe you find life such a problem because you think there are the good people and the bad people," said the man. "You're wrong, of course. There are, always and only, the bad people, but some of them are on opposite sides."
-- Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

17 Aug 2018, 10:01 am

It's considered a "standard, proper" word in Webster's Dictionary.

There is still a stigma attached to it though---especially as it relates to the "educational" or "social" level of the person uttering "ain't."



lostonearth35
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jan 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,937
Location: On a planet where I don't belong.

17 Aug 2018, 10:44 am

Why do people getting away with swearing all the time but saying ain't will make people faint?!? :lol:

Once when I was a teenager, I used the word ain't in front of my mom and my brother, and they were both shocked. Even though my mother had just said it, go figure. :roll: But I don't normally say it in everyday conversation, so maybe that was it.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,959
Location:      

17 Aug 2018, 12:34 pm

lostonearth35 wrote:
Why do people getting away with swearing all the time but saying ain't will make people faint? Once when I was a teenager, I used the word ain't in front of my mom and my brother, and they were both shocked. Even though my mother had just said it, go figure. But I don't normally say it in everyday conversation, so maybe that was it.
The first time I said, "Oh, man!" in front of my father, he went ballistic and grounded me for a week because he said I was 'swearing'. This was back in the 1960s, by the way.

It turns out that he had been working on a construction project with some fine, upstanding young men of African descent, and their favorite expletive was "Oh, man!". They also used the word 'ain't' a lot.

Y'see ... my dad was a bigot, and he didn't like having to work with "... those lazy, good-for-nothing <n-word>s"; especially that they were non-union and "... stealing jobs away..." from his friends.

(His words in quotes.)


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


lostonearth35
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jan 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,937
Location: On a planet where I don't belong.

17 Aug 2018, 4:51 pm

^ People have some real winners for parents on this site. And by winners I means losers who usually "win". :(