Trogluddite wrote:
In part, I think, because it is now so easy to find groups of people who are in the same demographic and share extremely similar views. It is the flip-side of the benefits of community spaces like this one. It is very easy now for people to interact only with others who will confirm their existing views of the world and never challenge them. Without the need for compromise and acceptance of dissent, opinions polarise and can very easily become more extreme.
This isn't entirely down to the internet, though that surely is a big factor. For example, here in the UK, the culture of the local pub has been eroded enormously, and many establishments which remain are "themed" to appeal to a particular demographic. So many have closed that many places don't really have a "local" any more. Having customers who were selected mainly by their location meant that it was common that people of a wide variety of ages and backgrounds came together in the same place and had to work out ways to manage their differences to avoid every night turning into a bar brawl. Though I'm not a religious person, I can see how the decline in attendance at places of worship might have the same effect.
Compromise is a skill which takes practice, like any other; my impression is that many people simply don't get enough practice.
This is very insightful. Thank you.
It's been decades since I've been in school and when I was, I did not take debate classes Debate classes, debate teams, etc were very popular in school for those students who were interested in it. I knew kids who were in debate and gleaned enough info from listening to them about how the debate process worked. What I found interesting is that a debate was between two students who crafted their convincing argument with each naturally taking the opposing viewpoint. It was productive in that often a student was assigned a viewpoint they may not have personally agreed with but were required to do their best to produce convincing arguments to support that viewpoint. Example: a debate about abortion. A pro-choice student being required to come up with convincing arguments to win a debate by representing a pro-life stance, etc.
I wonder if debate is alive and well in the high school systems to that degree today? Civil discourse seems to be a rarity in the "public square" so I have my doubts.