paolo wrote:
Irulan wrote:
Have you tried putting your dog on a mirror? I read somewhere, it was in Vonnegut's book if I'm not wrong that if you do so, the animal will leap out very quickly because it will perceive this mirror as if there was no ground under, as if there was only empty space under its legs.
I don't think this interpretation is right. The dog doesn't see himself in the looking glass. After all he doesn't know how he/she looks like. To know that what he/she sees is himself would require a conceptual apparatus he/she doesn't possess. What he/she sees in the looking glass is
another dog and he leaps away because is scared.
Observe my political correctness with this he/she business and also I am against using
it.
My dog once walked through a glass floor, and when she realised she could see through the floor, leaped off. It has nothing to do with reflections, since in her case there wasn't one, but I think she really though there was no floor under her, judging but her reaction.
If you call a dog, especially a generic one,
it, you're not undermining it. You could also call a baby
it in some occassions with no problems.
_________________
"Lightning is but a flicker of light, punctuated on all sides by darkness." - Loki