blitzkrieg wrote:
Millennials were/are the first generation to be worse off than their forebearers.
It isn't uncommon for boomers to have paid off their mortgages in their forties or fifties, something which would be a dreamy dream for millennials, or Gen Z. And that fact was because house prices used to be 2 or 3 times a yearly salary several decades ago, whilst now they are more often 10x a yearly salary, or more.
As well as anything else, boomers didn't endure a financial crash (2008), (Brexit in the UK 2016), Covid-19 ruining the economy or a cost of living crisis that boomers are only going to see the tail end of. Boomers weren't in the midst of the decline of western countries as clear, dominant economic superpowers that they once were.
Boomers had the chance to have reasonable private pensions, which are sparingly existent now. Boomers could simply ignore higher education and if they did have it, it was cheaper several decades ago, compared to now, even accounting for inflation.
In regards to the OP, in-store retail shopping is dwindling, and not only because boomers don't shop in person, but because young people shop online increasingly, too.
Not a bad summary, but it does miss the mark occasionally. I'm a 'Boomer', and was badly hit by the 2008 crash - I lost almost £5000 within a few hours after Lehman Bros went bust in September of that year. As a young 'Boomer' in the early 1980s I experienced 20%+ inflation in the UK during a period when my salary was only increasing by around 7%, and people with mortgages then (not me, admittedly) saw rates of 12%-17% for several years.
_________________
On a mountain range
I'm Doctor Strange