Kitty4670 wrote:
If seniors are 65, then why senior apartments are 55 here in California?
Good question.
We have 55+ apartments here in BC, too, but generally people aren’t considered seniors until 65.
And the longer people live (due to medical advances mostly) and the healthier they are at 55 65 75 then people don’t even seem that old even at those ages and it’s hard to consider them senior citizens.
My mom is 69, technically a senior but she’s not an “old,” person. I have friends in their 50’s-70’s and they don’t act or seem “old,” very often ever. Hell, my great aunt is 91 and one of the youngest old people I know.. she drives a red convertible Mustang and still plans on golfing for at least another 4 years. Youngest old person I know for sure but technically 100% she’s a senior.
Sooo.. 65+ is the general “rule,” but really IMO it depends how healthy and active people are whether they’re “old,” or simply “aged due to time passing.”
_________________
No
for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.