benjimanbreeg wrote:
Yeah exactly, and some silly people have these dog's as pets, and that's when disaster's can happen.
Hahahahaha. So I guess that makes me a silly person then

I've had working dogs as pets for 20 years and never had what you would call a 'disaster'. Your sweeping generalisation, together with your inappropriate use of apostrophes, makes me cross
EvilKimEvil wrote:
But I have to agree that working dogs do not make good pets. A dog with a high level of energy and intelligence can become destructive, and even aggressive, if unemployed.
Yes, a dog with energy and intelligence can find unacceptable ways to put them to use but that's really not limited to working dogs.
My dogs have always been working breeds (predominantly greyhound x collie lurchers). As working dogs I value them for their intelligence and they do make excellent pets. They are highly social and love being with people, are quick to learn and are very trainable.
However, they are only outstanding representatives of their species because I understand them and have never put them in a position where they feel uncertain about their place and they have no guidance. I don't mind them using their initiative (for example my old girl taught herself to open doors) but they know the ground rules of what is or isn't acceptable.
Bad owners make bad dogs, through ignorance and lack of understanding.