Page 1 of 2 [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next


Dogs or Cats?
Dogs 83%  83%  [ 10 ]
Cats 17%  17%  [ 2 ]
Total votes : 12

benjimanbreeg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,515

26 Nov 2007, 6:17 am

I feel like Ace Ventura pet detective, I love all animals, but where he had a phobia of bats, mine is with dogs. Half of it is to do with the fact of their hygeine, and the other half is, some of them are unpredictable. I had a dream last night where one was about to attack me. I think some species of dog's shouldn't be allowed to be pets. My nephew has a rott weiler(spelling), good choice eh! After saying this I would still probably risk my own life to save a dog if it was in danger, but I just wish I did'nt need to be in contact with them at all.



girl7000
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Mar 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 659
Location: Somewhere in the Atlantic

26 Nov 2007, 6:23 am

I am phobic of animals generally as I cannot predict or understand their behaviour. Dogs are by far the worst for me in terms of phobia thoug.



Comet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2006
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,290
Location: SpectrumForums.com

26 Nov 2007, 7:30 am

I was nearly attacked by a dog im not scarred of them just dont like them and im also very allergic to them and any other animal with fur,



Aspie_Chav
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2006
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,931
Location: Croydon

26 Nov 2007, 10:28 am

Dogs, I don’t like Labradors. Once I was at a party as a kind we was doing the hokey-cokey. Someone set me up to be in front of the dog, who supposedly love to do the hokey-cokey. After a few second I found out why. Why didn’t the dog try to bite my head off instead. :oops:



AspieMartian
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 18 Sep 2007
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 434

26 Nov 2007, 11:29 am

I'm not phobic of dogs at all. I've very good with them. I just prefer cats. There's some breeds I dislike more than other - I don't like miniture poodles or chihuahuas or other little yappy dogs. I don't think there's breeds that shouldn't be "pets" although certainly some breeds are bred for specific jobs that make them less ideal for an everyday household companion. All dogs are domsetic animals. It's just people often pick the wrong type of dogs for their own lifestyle or for the wrong reason.

As for their hygiene - dogs carry significantly less mircobial organisms on their hair and skin than humans (humans by comparison are pretty damn filthy) and their saliva has natural antiseptic properties, which is why dogs lick their wounds and "sensitive" regions. There's even been studies about their saliva - evidence suggests that wounds treated with canine saliva can heal faster than wounds treated with human-made antiseptics. That crazy guy who lives with wolves (forget his name) also says that whenever he just hurt, he lets the wolves lick his wounds and the wounds heal much faster than if he treated them the human way.



WhiteRaven
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 367
Location: Kent, England

26 Nov 2007, 11:32 am

i like most animals, i don't like large dogs though, not because i am scared of them, but because they are amazingly annoying


_________________
Fate usualy smiles upon one and frowns upon another in unison.


benjimanbreeg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,515

26 Nov 2007, 1:16 pm

. I don't think there's breeds that shouldn't be "pets" although certainly some breeds are bred for specific jobs that make them less ideal for an everyday household companion. All dogs are domsetic animals .[/quote]

Ok, say you had a baby, you would trust a rott weiler or doberman with the baby 100%? With these dogs, there's always gonna be situation where their tempremant is tested, and though it may not be the dog's fault, if they suddenly turn, someone's in trouble.

As for their hygiene - dogs carry significantly less mircobial organisms on their hair and skin than humans (humans by comparison are pretty damn filthy) and their saliva has natural antiseptic properties, which is why dogs lick their wounds and "sensitive" regions. There's even been studies about their saliva - evidence suggests that wounds treated with canine saliva can heal faster than wounds treated with human-made antiseptics. .[/quote]

I did'nt mean touching a dog's un-hygienic, their saliva has antiseptic properties, well I still wouldn't let them kiss me on the face after washing itself (all over!), like some people do, yuk!
And as for owner's who don't clear up after their dogs, the law should come down on them like a ton of bricks, as this could result in a child being blinded. 1st step- warning and 50 pound fine, 2nd step- Owner and dog training class, and community service- clearing up after other dogs, 3rd stike- re-home the dog, to someone who is loving and responsible.



Aspie1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,749
Location: United States

26 Nov 2007, 1:18 pm

I had a phobia of dogs (the medical term is "cynophobia") when I was about 5 years old. I would scream and climb on the nearest bench or playground structure, so "the dog wouldn't reach me". It didn't matter if it was a big German Shepherd or a tiny Chihuahua; I was scared of all dogs. And if the dog started barking at me, it took me a lot of effort not to start running like the wind.

Then, around the age of 8 or so, I did a complete 180 in my attitude toward dogs. It became my favorite animal, and I wanted a dog more than anything. (Maybe the time my neighbor showed me puppies that were small enough to fit in my hands had something to do with it.) I still like dogs, and one day, I'm hoping to get one as a pet.



Beenthere
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Age: 59
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,013
Location: Pa.

26 Nov 2007, 4:39 pm

Not exactly phobic...I like dogs, but the bigger ones make me nervous.


_________________
*Normal* is just a setting on the dryer.


Anubis
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Sep 2006
Age: 138
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,911
Location: Mount Herculaneum/England

26 Nov 2007, 4:44 pm

Not at all, but I HATE the mess that both cats and dogs leave, dog poop moreso because they'll poo anywhere.


_________________
Lalalalai.... I'll cut you up!


beautifuloblivion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Nov 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 947
Location: Colorado

26 Nov 2007, 4:56 pm

I'm uneasy around any animal that has the capability to rip my insides out.



woodsman25
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 18 May 2007
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,064
Location: NY

27 Nov 2007, 7:57 am

I dont like dogs, they invade my personal space, park and try to climb on ya.


_________________
DX'ed with HFA as a child. However this was in 1987 and I am certain had I been DX'ed a few years later I would have been DX'ed with AS instead.


Macallan
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 15 Oct 2007
Age: 59
Gender: Female
Posts: 371

27 Nov 2007, 8:14 am

No, absolutely no dog or cat phobia here.

My life isn't complete without a dog to share it.



EvilKimEvil
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Sep 2007
Age: 47
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,671

27 Nov 2007, 12:13 pm

First of all, domestic dogs are a single species. Rottweilers are a breed, defined by appearance and lineage. There is no breed that is uniformly safe or unsafe. Each individual has a different temperment, created through an interaction between their genes and environment, just like humans or any other animal.

Technically, no dog of any size or breed should be left alone with a baby. Just about any animal could accidentally hurt a baby.

Unfortunately, many people prefer to think in extremes. So the belief persists that some breeds, like labs and goldens, are always safe, whereas other breeds are unsafe. In reality, the only way to assess a dog's temperment is to pay attention to its actions. They communicate a lot through their body language.

I've been bitten by dogs before (a Border Collie and a Rough Collie). I used to fear them, but that changed when I came to understand the way in which they communicate. Now I pay attention to what they are saying and respect their space.

But I have to agree that working dogs do not make good pets. A dog with a high level of energy and intelligence can become destructive, and even aggressive, if unemployed.



benjimanbreeg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,515

27 Nov 2007, 12:22 pm

EvilKimEvil wrote:
First of all, domestic dogs are a single species. Rottweilers are a breed, defined by appearance and lineage. There is no breed that is uniformly safe or unsafe. Each individual has a different temperment, created through an interaction between their genes and environment, just like humans or any other animal.

Technically, no dog of any size or breed should be left alone with a baby. Just about any animal could accidentally hurt a baby.

Unfortunately, many people prefer to think in extremes. So the belief persists that some breeds, like labs and goldens, are always safe, whereas other breeds are unsafe. In reality, the only way to assess a dog's temperment is to pay attention to its actions. They communicate a lot through their body language.

I've been bitten by dogs before (a Border Collie and a Rough Collie). I used to fear them, but that changed when I came to understand the way in which they communicate. Now I pay attention to what they are saying and respect their space.

But I have to agree that working dogs do not make good pets. A dog with a high level of energy and intelligence can become destructive, and even aggressive, if unemployed.



Yeah exactly, and some silly people have these dog's as pets, and that's when disaster's can happen.



Macallan
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 15 Oct 2007
Age: 59
Gender: Female
Posts: 371

27 Nov 2007, 1:20 pm

benjimanbreeg wrote:
Yeah exactly, and some silly people have these dog's as pets, and that's when disaster's can happen.

Hahahahaha. So I guess that makes me a silly person then :roll: I've had working dogs as pets for 20 years and never had what you would call a 'disaster'. Your sweeping generalisation, together with your inappropriate use of apostrophes, makes me cross :evil:

EvilKimEvil wrote:
But I have to agree that working dogs do not make good pets. A dog with a high level of energy and intelligence can become destructive, and even aggressive, if unemployed.


Yes, a dog with energy and intelligence can find unacceptable ways to put them to use but that's really not limited to working dogs.

My dogs have always been working breeds (predominantly greyhound x collie lurchers). As working dogs I value them for their intelligence and they do make excellent pets. They are highly social and love being with people, are quick to learn and are very trainable.

However, they are only outstanding representatives of their species because I understand them and have never put them in a position where they feel uncertain about their place and they have no guidance. I don't mind them using their initiative (for example my old girl taught herself to open doors) but they know the ground rules of what is or isn't acceptable.

Bad owners make bad dogs, through ignorance and lack of understanding.