Strapples wrote:
philosopherBoi wrote:
Alin parents can pretty much do whatever they want to their children, so if they want to strip the autism genetics out before they are born, or after they are born they can. Also if the majority truly wants it they can redo the entire constitution and make it law that all autistic people are to be aborted before they are born and that any alive must be locked away or genetically modified. Face it we have lost the opposition will win they will destroy our uniqueness and we will slowly fade from the world then slip from the world's memory. Why waste time when we could just end it now instead of suffering at the hands of our oppressors.
actually. it is not legal to make that a law.... it would violate so many constitutional rights it wouldnt be funny.
....
Sadly, there are lots of laws (most?) that are Unconstitutional. Doesn't matter
who has the job of drawing attention away from those in Power (that's the job of POTUS if you didn't know...)
If you doubt me, just read the 10th Amendment. 90%+ of the US government is not permitted by the Constitution.
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
Which is why the Commerce Clause has been tortured into being the foundation of most US Federal "Law"...
For example: the Commerce Clause was cited in the 2005 decision Gonzales v. Raich. In this case, a California woman sued the Drug Enforcement Administration after her medical marijuana crop was seized and destroyed by Federal agents. Medical marijuana was explicitly made legal under California state law by Proposition 215; however, marijuana is prohibited at the federal level by the Controlled Substances Act. Even though the woman grew the marijuana strictly for her own consumption and never sold any, the Supreme Court stated that growing one's own marijuana affects the interstate market of marijuana, citing the Wickard v. Filburn decision. The theory was that the marijuana
could enter the stream of interstate commerce, even if it clearly wasn't grown for that purpose and it was unlikely ever to happen. It therefore ruled that this practice may be regulated by the federal government under the authority of the Commerce Clause.
When we start arresting people for things they "could" do, we're in serious trouble...
_________________
Malum Prohibitum, Malum Habenae Regum Est.
I'm not Jesus. Stop punishing me for other people's sins.
True Liberty Expressed as Fiction:
http://www.bigheadpress.com/tpbtgn