anomie wrote:
OneStepBeyond wrote:
it's our language so I shall assume we get the right of way(:
Just to let people know, not all brits think this way. I'm from the UK, I don't think English is "ours" and I see that as a bigoted opinion.
Even if it did make sense to say a language belonged to anyone (apart from maybe .NET belonging to microsoft) then surely English belongs to everyone who speaks it and certainly to everyone who has it as their native language, be they Australian, American, Jamaican or whoever.
Off-topic maybe, but I felt I had to defend brits as not all being full of that sort of crap.
I have to agree with you, and thank you for taking the time. I'm not British--I'm an American who regularly sees/hears British people making comments about their forms of English being the most "correct." One dialect is no more correct than the other and no one country owns a language; the English spoken in England is equally as correct as that spoken in the US, New Zealand, or even Singapore. In fact, in some ways, American English has changed less over the past couple of centuries than British English has, making it ever-so-slightly closer to the original shared ancestor. For example, American English still uses words such as "gotten," most variants are still rhotic (pronouncing Rs in words), and the American accent has changed less in general than the British one has. Of course, I'm not saying that American English is more correct than British English--simply pointing out how silly it is to say that British English is more correct or that England owns English. I would be fascinated to see a study which compares how English has evolved over time in each of the English-speaking countries (of which there are many).
_________________
"A flower falls, even though we love it; and a weed grows, even though we do not love it."