Page 7 of 26 [ 415 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 26  Next

Lukeda420
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,640
Location: Chicago suburbs.

12 Sep 2015, 11:21 am

Booyakasha wrote:
I said what meant, i won't repeat myself any more.


Also what good does it do to say the name of the thread is against the rules but take no action? I don't get it.



TheAP
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Dec 2014
Age: 27
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,314
Location: Canada

12 Sep 2015, 2:45 pm

I don't think the thread title is offensive. It's not saying that all men are misogynists. It's only saying that some of the men on this forum are.



Peejay
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2014
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 301
Location: UK

12 Sep 2015, 4:45 pm

Are there nice misogynists?

Is a `terrible misogynist` a person who is not very good at misogyny?



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

12 Sep 2015, 4:55 pm

Booyakasha wrote:
yeah really, so many terrible mysognists on this forum, while we just keep on banning that psychopatic man hater. :roll:

I+ve never seen a man open 40 accounts just to bash women.


This one alone brought a total balance between misandry and misogyny here.



Peacesells
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Sep 2014
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,915
Location: Anzio, Italy

12 Sep 2015, 5:55 pm

I don't think the misogynists are so many here, on L&D it's always the same people. Besides my post was reported and deleted just because I said that it's silly not to want to talk to men anymore just because a little share of them are misogynists, meh.

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
This one alone brought a total balance between misandry and misogyny here.

Yeah and sometimes it's other people too, not only her.



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Arizona

12 Sep 2015, 6:08 pm

It would be nice to name names and post specific incidences of misogyny, I don't think it's that wide spread but perhaps I'm just ignorant to what you consider misogyny. Maybe I'm doing it and I don't even know! 8O HELP!



YippySkippy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2011
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,986

12 Sep 2015, 6:17 pm

A thread made for people to discuss misogyny is now a thread full of men discussing misandry. Ironic.



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Arizona

12 Sep 2015, 6:22 pm

YippySkippy wrote:
A thread made for people to discuss misogyny is now a thread full of men discussing misandry. Ironic.


Nobody is really trying to talk about misogyny tho, most of this thread is arguing about whether or not the thread title was offensive. I'd like to discuss it but what are we talking about specifically?



YippySkippy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2011
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,986

12 Sep 2015, 6:57 pm

Quote:
I'd like to discuss it but what are we talking about specifically?


As far as I can tell, it's against the rules to discuss it.



Amity
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,714
Location: Meandering

12 Sep 2015, 7:17 pm

Jacoby wrote:
Nobody is really trying to talk about misogyny tho, most of this thread is arguing about whether or not the thread title was offensive. I'd like to discuss it but what are we talking about specifically?

This
Inle wrote:
Are Aspies more likely to be misogynists than NTs? Or is this just how men really think? Makes me never want to speak to any ever again. :(


There aren't that many misogynists on WP, but it exists here, it is real.

Its like bad news, it sells, even if it isn't an accurate representation of all ASD men. Its like how everyone notices the loud person in an argument shouting over the person trying to engage in a debate.
Quote:
Is the media negative? Media studies show that bad news far outweighs good news by as much as seventeen negative news reports for every one good news report. Why? The answer may lie in the work of evolutionary psychologists and neuroscientists. Humans seek out news of dramatic, negative events. These experts say that our brains evolved in a hunter-gatherer environment where anything novel or dramatic had to be attended to immediately for survival. So while we no longer defend ourselves against saber-toothed tigers, our brains have not caught up.

Many studies have shown that we care more about the threat of bad things than we do about the prospect of good things. Our negative brain tripwires are far more sensitive than our positive triggers. We tend to get more fearful than happy. And each time we experience fear we turn on our stress hormones.

Another explanation comes from probability theory. In essence, negative and unusual things happen all the time in the world. In his book, Innumeracy, John Allen Paulos explains that if the news is about a small neighborhood of 500 or 5,000, then the possibility that something unusual has happened is low. Unusual things don't happen to individual people very often. That's why very local news like a neighborhood newsletters tends to have less bad news. But in a large city of 1 million, dramatic and negative incidents happen all the time. But most people watch national or worldwide media where news reports come in from large cities at a large scale, so the prevalence of negative stories increase. Add the size of social networking communication, and we expand geometrically bad news. So from evolutionary and neuro-scientific and probability perspectives, we are hard-wired to look for the dramatic and negative, and when we find it, we share it.


WP is like an ecosystem to me, certain actions have a ripple effect. A climate where misogynistic generalisations are made about all women, is not a welcoming climate for women in general. Even if its just a handful of voices being unwelcoming, that can have a powerful effect on women who have had a lifetime supply of being made unwelcome. I guess they just might be sensitive to this sort of mistreatment.

One guy says "this awful thing happened to me... all women are like this, or that" Another guy reponds with more of the same, and all of a sudden the stereotype of the analytical aspie gets discarded, as guys who might normally be rational posit anecdotal evidence as fact.

It is absurd to watch. L&D is like the only sub forum where anecdotal evidence is accepted as 100% valid, and the mob seems for the most part happy to ignore this. (Some of the guys are decent enough to object, but get called white knights or some other BS)

The most insulting thing is that ASD women are included in these broad sweeping generalisations, and any woman that challenges the incorrect assertions about them had better be one hell of a woman because she will be utterly outnumbered. The women like Androbot that take the time to listen and understand become as she describes whipping girls. The rest of us just might not be able to take on that unnecessary hassle in a place we come to, to get away from that kind of BS.



YippySkippy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2011
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,986

12 Sep 2015, 7:59 pm

Quote:
Call the animal control on her and tell them you have a rabid chimp in your house, they will understand and respond immediately and tranquilize her and take her away and relocate her!


Here's a recent gem from L&D. This is advice for what to do about a controlling girlfriend.



YippySkippy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2011
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,986

12 Sep 2015, 8:04 pm

Quote:
hey, we all know that all of you aspie ladies will eventually get boyfriends/husbands, including the most whining ones among will get one, like this member **cough** Sweet***leaf***got a (extrovert) boyfriend recently, and there was this . **cough**goofysomething**cough** who got 2 boyfriends so far since her last rant.


Here's a personal attack on WP women, again in L&D.



androbot01
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,746
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada

12 Sep 2015, 8:22 pm

Booyakasha wrote:
yep, but our duty is to protect members of this forum. the title says "terrible mysoginists on this forum" and thus it has made it an attack towards the members of this forum.

Btw, if anyone sees mysogynistic posts/threads, please report them. There are only a few of us and we don't have time or resources to check every post and thread.


I've never reported anything and I have no desire to do so.
Here are a few current threads from L&D. I have not chosen them because they are attacking women, although, they have potential. But rather because they are engaging in generalizations about women. As if we are some multi-headed hydra that has to be conspired against.
It is this othering of women that I object to. If a guy has had a bad experience with a girl, fine. Let's talk about it, but one woman is not all women. Even you have taken one woman to represent us all in your previous posts on this thread.


Amity wrote:
The most insulting thing is that ASD women are included in these broad sweeping generalisations, and any woman that challenges the incorrect assertions about them had better be one hell of a woman because she will be utterly outnumbered. The women like Androbot that take the time to listen and understand become as she describes whipping girls. The rest of us just might not be able to take on that unnecessary hassle in a place we come to, to get away from that kind of BS.

Thanks.



Last edited by Skilpadde on 13 Sep 2015, 6:49 am, edited 1 time in total.: Links removed because they were singling out members

Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Arizona

12 Sep 2015, 9:18 pm

First comment seems more just off color and would need to read the thread for context but I've seen the other one or posts like that and that usually comes about during some long pissing match about whether or not Aspie guys or girls have it worse which obviously serves no productive purpose since we're individuals who differ far more person to person than gender to gender. Our experiences in life aren't the sum of our reproductive parts, that doesn't mean there isn't a difference in expectations and gender roles which is something I think most women would agree with.

The male gender role is much more rigid today than the female gender role I think and it kind of runs completely counter to the way most men on the spectrum are so naturally I think there is a lot of bitterness and frustration on their part but society is split 50/50 so its pretty unfair to blame any one sex for the way things are when it's clear that everybody plays their part in maintaining it. I imagine most of these misogynist posters probably hate other men as well if not more FWIW.

Maybe I'm just a depressed person but it's hard for me to get angry at my deficits and inadequacies, I direct that inward towards myself but I don't know if that is any healthier. I don't get jealous or envious of people, I get down on myself and feel more isolated. It doesn't make any sense, they are who they are and I am who am so what point is there to it? We all experience things differently, some people's reaction in same situation is to feel persecuted and to place blame and be angry while other detach entirely. We're all guilty of making generalizations sometimes too, certainly not uncommon on the internet.

I dunno, I just try to understand people and where they're coming from. Our world's aren't as big as most NTs so our experiences in almost everything are severely limited which can lend itself to resentment and making these broad stroke arguments and generalizations to compensate. I would venture to say tho that most people that make these comments probably would change their tune if their personal experience changed for the better, are they truly hateful or are they just languishing out of frustration?

I think L&D is kind of like another Haven since our primary issue socializing and relationships so obviously that's going to be the most volatile negative part of the site unfortunately. I wish things were better for us all.



YippySkippy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2011
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,986

12 Sep 2015, 9:32 pm

Quote:
I dunno, I just try to understand people and where they're coming from. Our world's aren't as big as most NTs so our experiences in almost everything are severely limited which can lend itself to resentment and making these broad stroke arguments and generalizations to compensate. I would venture to say tho that most people that make these comments probably would change their tune if their personal experience changed for the better, are they truly hateful or are they just languishing out of frustration?

I think L&D is kind of like another Haven since our primary issue socializing and relationships so obviously that's going to be the most volatile negative part of the site unfortunately. I wish things were better for us all.


It's one thing to understand the cause of a behavior, and another to allow that to be an excuse for that behavior.
We shouldn't say, "X has an unhappy love life, so he should be allowed to say hurtful things to/about women." Women should not have to be victims of someone else's dissatisfaction with life.



Peacesells
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Sep 2014
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,915
Location: Anzio, Italy

12 Sep 2015, 9:43 pm

YippySkippy wrote:
Quote:
Call the animal control on her and tell them you have a rabid chimp in your house, they will understand and respond immediately and tranquilize her and take her away and relocate her!


Here's a recent gem from L&D. This is advice for what to do about a controlling girlfriend.

I don't know what are his views about women, but here he was just joking it seems, it shouldn't be taken seriously.
androbot01 wrote:
I've never reported anything and I have no desire to do so.
Here are a few current threads from L&D. I have not chosen them because they are attacking women, although, they have potential. But rather because they are engaging in generalizations about women. As if we are some multi-headed hydra that has to be conspired against.
It is this othering of women that I object to. If a guy has had a bad experience with a girl, fine. Let's talk about it, but one woman is not all women. Even you have taken one woman to represent us all in your previous posts on this thread.

Girls agree to go out and then change their mind

Do women like shy men?

So women desire men who are leaders

In the first link I think it's obvious that he's talking about these girls he met, I really don't think that he did anything bad. About the other two yeah they sound silly.