Hector wrote:
I am particularly interested in women answering these questions. Have you or would you:
1. Change your name after marriage
2. Have a wedding ceremony
3. Be "engaged" prior to marrying
4. Have a prenupital agreement (if it's legal in your country)
What would your reasons be? And how would you feel if your partner held the opposite viewpoint, in each case?
I chose to change my name, since my maiden name wasn't "mine" but my father's (also for the practical reason that my husband's last name is easier to spell.) If he had been opposed to me taking his name I would have thought it very odd, like he didn't want me to be associated with him and his family.
I had a wedding ceremony, albeit very low-key. I would have been fine with having a civil ceremony at the court house, if he had preferred.
I was "engaged", in that we agreed we would be married on a certain date several months in the future of our discussion of getting married. I don't know how one can get married without being engaged, truthfully--what are you imagining here? Like you are just casually dating until suddenly one day you get married with no planning? Even if you elope to Vegas, you're still going to be technically engaged from the moment you decide to be wed until Elvis is pronouncing you man and wife...
I wouldn't have a prenuptial agreement because it shows a lack of trust. If my partner didn't trust me, I wouldn't marry him.