Daryl_Blonder wrote:
Pretty much every inventor, scientist, and innovator you can think of, Einstein, Bill Gates, Zuckerberg, Isaac Asimov, Mozart, displayed signs of HFA. It is indeed safe to say that it's *possible* that virtually all of the technology we use came from Aspergian brains. It's not "worthless anecdotal evidence."
Actually, your claim is the epitome of anecdotal evidence.
from wiki:
Quote:
(1) Evidence in the form of an anecdote or hearsay is called anecdotal if there is doubt about its veracity; the evidence itself is considered untrustworthy.
(2) Evidence, which may itself be true and verifiable, used to deduce a conclusion which does not follow from it, usually by generalizing from an insufficient amount of evidence. For example "my grandfather smoked like a chimney and died healthy in a car crash at the age of 99" does not disprove the proposition that "smoking markedly increases the probability of cancer and heart disease at a relatively early age". In this case, the evidence may itself be true, but does not warrant the conclusion.
In both cases the conclusion is unreliable; it may not be untrue, but it doesn't follow from the "evidence".
Evidence can be anecdotal in both senses: "Goat yogurt prolongs life: I heard that a man in a mountain village who ate only yogurt lived to 120."
The term is often used in contrast to scientific evidence, such as evidence-based medicine, which are types of formal accounts. Some anecdotal evidence does not qualify as scientific evidence because its nature prevents it from being investigated using the scientific method. Misuse of anecdotal evidence is a logical fallacy and is sometimes informally referred to as the "person who" fallacy ("I know a person who..."; "I know of a case where..." etc. Compare with hasty generalization). Anecdotal evidence is not necessarily representative of a "typical" experience; statistical evidence can more accurately determine how typical something is.
Since there is no scientific study to either prove or disprove your claims, I will counter your argument with my own personal anecdotes on the matter.
I say this as someone who has spent a decade in scientific research.
It is a total myth that scientific labs are inhabited by introverted, socially awkward AS-like individuals. We are a minority there just like everywhere else in the world.
In my career, I have met quite a few extremely brilliant people (with IQs that were off the charts) who used their talents to make world-changing breakthroughs.
They are geniuses in every sense of the word, with none of the various social and mental deficits that I have.
The common assumption that most or even many scientists have poor social skills is an assumption made by those who get all their information from popular media stereotypes. It is sad to see that ignorant myth constantly repeated on this forum.
The few AS-like individuals I have encountered in my career while good (but not extraordinarily great) at their work, were marginalized to the periphery of their departments just as they are marginalized elsewhere in life.
I would say that the progress of science would carry on fine without us.
Last edited by Molecular_Biologist on 23 Feb 2011, 8:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.