Page 2 of 2 [ 31 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

EXPECIALLY
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Oct 2011
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 701

04 Feb 2012, 1:35 pm

OneStepBeyond wrote:
proxybear wrote:
ocdgirl123 wrote:
Am not a grammar snob


You clearly aren't.


Yeah, she kinda already told us that...
I bet even though it only had three words you checked your post several times to make sure you didn't have to face the humiliation of having a grammatical error in a snarky post about someone else's grammatical error. that is no way to live my son

I'm not (:


LMAO ITA.

Someone recently "corrected'"my use of "your" to "you're" and got it wrong on another site recently.

Hilarity ensued.


_________________
AD/HD BAP.

HDTV...

Whatever.


MrXxx
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2010
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,760
Location: New England

04 Feb 2012, 1:58 pm

I'm not a "Nazi" about it when it comes to other people's use of the English language. There's no telling who people are, where they are from, whether English is their native tongue, or what cultural background might influence the way they speak and write. As long as I an understand them, that's all that matters to me.

When I speak and write myself, I do try to structure things as properly as I can, but at times I do break the "rules" intentionally, in favor of being clearly understood. Sometimes the proper structure of sentences, and even at time proper word usage is, in my opinion, inefficient.

I'm a huge fan of Mark Twain, who broke the rules all the time by using common speech and dialects. I've never had any trouble understanding anything he wrote. Just because I'm not a famous writer doesn't mean I have no right to break rules as famous writers do. I don't care what my high school English teachers told me.

Clarity and understanding are all that matter to me. Not what some stuffy people sitting in some private meeting decide the rules ought to be for the next edition of Little Brown Handbook.


_________________
I'm not likely to be around much longer. As before when I first signed up here years ago, I'm finding that after a long hiatus, and after only a few days back on here, I'm spending way too much time here again already. So I'm requesting my account be locked, banned or whatever. It's just time. Until then, well, I dunno...


howzat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Aug 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,802
Location: Hornsey North London

04 Feb 2012, 3:26 pm

My grammar and spelling is ok.



proxybear
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 28 Apr 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 163

04 Feb 2012, 3:36 pm

OneStepBeyond wrote:
proxybear wrote:
ocdgirl123 wrote:
Am not a grammar snob


You clearly aren't.


Yeah, she kinda already told us that...
I bet even though it only had three words you checked your post several times to make sure you didn't have to face the humiliation of having a grammatical error in a snarky post about someone else's grammatical error. that is no way to live my son

I'm not (:


Are you seriously suggesting that I had to double check the sentence "You clearly aren't"?

Now, I do double check forum posts I write (very much so if I make a "comeback"), but not when it's so basic.



OneStepBeyond
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,310

04 Feb 2012, 4:21 pm

proxybear wrote:
OneStepBeyond wrote:
proxybear wrote:
ocdgirl123 wrote:
Am not a grammar snob


You clearly aren't.


Yeah, she kinda already told us that...
I bet even though it only had three words you checked your post several times to make sure you didn't have to face the humiliation of having a grammatical error in a snarky post about someone else's grammatical error. that is no way to live my son

I'm not (:


Are you seriously suggesting that I had to double check the sentence "You clearly aren't"?

Now, I do double check forum posts I write (very much so if I make a "comeback"), but not when it's so basic.


yes.
you're probably breaking into a sweat now that we've reached multiple sentences



readingbetweenlines
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Oct 2010
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 622
Location: UK

04 Feb 2012, 4:23 pm

EXPECIALLY wrote:
My user name may or may not have been created with the intent of making the Grammar Nazis immensely uncomfortable.


That is not working but the all caps style is quite annoying visually so you're achieving something with the readability brigade! :wink:


_________________
I have traveled extensively in Concord (Thoreau)


EXPECIALLY
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Oct 2011
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 701

04 Feb 2012, 4:41 pm

readingbetweenlines wrote:
EXPECIALLY wrote:
My user name may or may not have been created with the intent of making the Grammar Nazis immensely uncomfortable.


That is not working but the all caps style is quite annoying visually so you're achieving something with the readability brigade! :wink:


The caps were the backup measure should the initial plan fail :)


_________________
AD/HD BAP.

HDTV...

Whatever.


Jellybean
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Apr 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,795
Location: Bedford UK

04 Feb 2012, 4:43 pm

Me iz not got da problem wiv me gramma innit. Or me spellin. Me don't go correctin uvvers eiver. Y dont know if deyz got a problem wiv da writing izzit?

But seriously though I am a very good speller but not so good at grammar. I still somehow managed to get an A in GCSE English though...


_________________
I have HFA, ADHD, OCD & Tourette syndrome. I love animals, especially my bunnies and hamster. I skate in a roller derby team (but I'll try not to bite ;) )


readingbetweenlines
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Oct 2010
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 622
Location: UK

04 Feb 2012, 5:06 pm

EXPECIALLY wrote:
readingbetweenlines wrote:
EXPECIALLY wrote:
My user name may or may not have been created with the intent of making the Grammar Nazis immensely uncomfortable.


That is not working but the all caps style is quite annoying visually so you're achieving something with the readability brigade! :wink:


The caps were the backup measure should the initial plan fail :)


:D :D :D Good plan!


_________________
I have traveled extensively in Concord (Thoreau)


proxybear
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 28 Apr 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 163

04 Feb 2012, 5:22 pm

OneStepBeyond wrote:
proxybear wrote:
OneStepBeyond wrote:
proxybear wrote:
ocdgirl123 wrote:
Am not a grammar snob


You clearly aren't.


Yeah, she kinda already told us that...
I bet even though it only had three words you checked your post several times to make sure you didn't have to face the humiliation of having a grammatical error in a snarky post about someone else's grammatical error. that is no way to live my son

I'm not (:


Are you seriously suggesting that I had to double check the sentence "You clearly aren't"?

Now, I do double check forum posts I write (very much so if I make a "comeback"), but not when it's so basic.


yes.
you're probably breaking into a sweat now that we've reached multiple sentences


Not really. I just read it once after I have written everything down. It might not be grammar mistakes that I discover, but rather better wording for what I am trying to express.



circular
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jan 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 361
Location: France

04 Feb 2012, 5:30 pm

auntblabby wrote:
Tollorin wrote:
I am certainly not. I've got difficulty with grammar, it don't make sense to me, and ADD don't help. Of course I'm talking about the infamous french grammar here, a real nightmare of rules.

that makes me feel much better about my failure to learn french.

I am French and I don't have much difficulty with grammar. I make some mistakes when I do not pay attention, but I can notice them if I take enough time to do so.

So French is ok for me, but I understand that it can be very difficult, for example for someone who has another mother language. I would not say that French grammar is infamous though. It is just a bit complicated, but quite logical. But French spelling is not logical, as English spelling.



Trainbuff
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 247
Location: New York City

04 Feb 2012, 8:48 pm

I have horrible spelling, when I was younger I never passed a spelling test, except for one because I cheated lol.

Based on my memories from High School, my grammar wasn't on point either. Wasn't flat out terrible per se, but it wasn't great.



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,762
Location: the island of defective toy santas

05 Feb 2012, 12:46 pm

"it's a damned poor mind, that can't think of more than one way to spell a word!"



infinitenull
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 628
Location: Home

06 Feb 2012, 8:05 am

EXPECIALLY wrote:
OneStepBeyond wrote:
proxybear wrote:
ocdgirl123 wrote:
Am not a grammar snob


Someone recently "corrected'"my use of "your" to "you're" and got it wrong on another site recently.

Hilarity ensued.


Your and you're are easy, they shoulda known better than to give you a rough time. Who and whom are a real pain in the neck! (I think it has to do with prepositions)

As for me, if I try harder I can clean up my grammar. The problem is, if I do that then I cannot be conversational on forums. I prefer to let myself get away with things like extra commas... triple periods, and the like! I think of it as a more-sophisticated version of txt speak U NO?


_________________
Very high systematizing, low empathy, but moderate to high sympathy.
I do not experience cognitive dissonance reduction the way that other people do.
Professionally diagnosed in March 2018


proxybear
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 28 Apr 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 163

06 Feb 2012, 8:27 am

infinitenull wrote:
EXPECIALLY wrote:
OneStepBeyond wrote:
proxybear wrote:
ocdgirl123 wrote:
Am not a grammar snob


Someone recently "corrected'"my use of "your" to "you're" and got it wrong on another site recently.

Hilarity ensued.


Your and you're are easy, they shoulda known better than to give you a rough time. Who and whom are a real pain in the neck! (I think it has to do with prepositions)
To whom are you addressing? (Just wanted to use "whom" in a sentence trololo).

Anyway, it looks like you quoted me saying that I messed up "you're" and "your", which is pretty hilarious.