kraftiekortie wrote:
But there is the notion, which I find to be true based upon anecdote:
That: Aspergians have relative difficulties visual-spatially, but are quite intact verbally
The opposite seems true with people with "high-functioning" autism who are not seen as being Aspergian.
Though the above is really only a generalization.
In my life, I have found people with classic autism to be, at times, even physically gifted, with excellent balance. Aspergians, on the other hand, frequently seem clumsy physically.
This might be a meaningless distinction with aspergers on the way out, but since you know I love these conversations, I'll respond anyways.
You're talking about a subtype of aspie that aligns more with Non-Verbal Learning Disability. They have great verbal skills and rotten visual spacial skills.
But there are also aspies, like myself, who have great visual spacial skills and deficits in language processing. Your stereotypical science-nerd-genius is usually of this type, as science usually requires great visual spacial skills. (Except biology, lol) These folks tend to be co-morbid with auditory processing disorder.
They are both significant differences in sensory processing. But with the first you have deficits in visual processing, and the second you have deficits in auditory processing. I guess that it would fit with this theory that you could also have motor processing problmes - the dispraxia type you mentioned.
In general, we both have enough strengths in other areas of of our IQ to compensate to a certain degree. At least, that was the point - to have a diagnostic catagory for those who are able compensate and to keep them distinguished from those who would not and would need life-time care. Except, we all know life isn't that simple.