KaliMa wrote:
Oh, absolutely! You're 100% right, the NTs use the passive-agressive style and nobody considers it an attack, then if you're honest and direct in answering them, everybody thinks you're a jerk. It's so frustrating when nobody but you is willing to see what's really going on and anybody you try to talk to about it says you're overreacting, what the person said was nothing.
I can't tell if passive-aggressive is just so acceptable in the NT world that they do hear what's being said and honestly don't consider it an attack, or if they are consciously or subconsciously not admitting to what they hear because they don't want to deal with reality.
I honestly think that most NTs don't even process those comments in the same way we do. There was an interesting thread started recently about the brains of those with ASDs potentially lacking the ability to utilize some kind of chemical that rises in response to being teased, and that this chemical somehow facilitates bonding between peers. I think it's called vasopressin or something like that. Anyway, there's a new theory that an NT brain would take up that initial comment about not being able to live without a car, and see it as the other person teasing them in a friendly way and trying to further some type of closer contact. However, someone with an ASD won't be able to "correctly" utilize this chemical that arises in response to being teased, and so we interpret that type of statement as hostile criticism and therefore a direct threat. It's an interesting theory, because I've always reacted aggressively to such teasing, and I never could figure out why other people actually seemed to enjoy being teased that way.