To clarify again, I'm not talking about copyright above. I'm talking about common decency. If someone doesn't want you to mirror their site (in any way), why do it? It seems inconsiderate and disrespectful. I don't want to get into some babble or battle about whether something technically violates some rule or another, that's not the point. The point is it doesn't serve a good purpose to do that once you know the person doesn't want you to be doing it.
As an aside, I seriously hope I don't have to give my snailmail address to strangers if someone ever genuinely plagiarizes me on this site. I've dealt with genuine online plagiarists before (not saying that's what you're doing here), and most sites have not required some ridiculously extensive proof of my identity in order to delete the copyrighted information. In fact, none have.
But again, law aside, if you've got someone's work on your site, and they don't want it there, why not just remove it to be nice instead of getting all defensive and rule-y?
Basically... jypsy has apparently had so much stress in her life that she deleted the site. Maybe for more reasons than just too stressed to maintain it, maybe she seriously didn't want it sitting there easily accessible without that kind of archive search. And if she's that incredibly stressed, putting more stress on her by doing something against her wishes seems insensitive and it would seem like the good thing to do is apologize and take it down rather than get embroiled in whether or not it's technically legal to do what you did. There are many things that are legal to do but not nice to do, and I don't understand why you wouldn't want to be nice.
_________________
"In my world it's a place of patterns and feel. In my world it's a haven for what is real. It's my world, nobody can steal it, but people like me, we live in the shadows." -Donna Williams