Acacia wrote:
I can identify with this. But it depends on the situation.
Like right now. I can express myself very clearly through writing.
I am usually eloquent and precise, if not a bit verbose and pedantic.
When people see my writing, I've had comments in the past about how I should pursue a doctorate, I should be published, I am a beautiful writer, a poet, etc.
This contrasts sharply with my speaking abilities.
When I speak, I fumble for words, stutter, say wrong things, speak too quietly or too loudly, drone on in a boring monontone voice, and so on.
So when people hear me speak, they think I must either be rather thick-headed, or just extremely anxious, or perhaps both.
So there can be misperceptions both ways.
I think of myself as somewhere in the middle of these two extremes.
Oh I am exactly the same. I have evidence of this too: I was in the paper and was interviewed by phone, so my quotes sound like a 10 year olds. It's embarrassing but people still thought I did a good job. These same people have heard me speak, so I guess it's no surprise that they think the article is fine. Had it been an e-mail interview I would have sounded much more mature. Oh well.
I used to always think I was dumb, because that's basically the way my teachers made me feel. They put me in a remedial class, which my mum thought helped me. We learned at a really slow pace, which was not the way I liked to learn. I never did anything in that class but talk to the troublemakers, which were my friends.
I never thought I was smart at all until I did an IQ test and found out I had an IQ of above 90. Then I became obsessed with them and now I have an IQ of between 125-130 and that's fine with me: the girl that used to write notes to her friends in remedial class.