Accepting Autism is Like a Traffic Jam

Page 8 of 22 [ 337 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 22  Next

2ukenkerl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jul 2007
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,277

13 Dec 2007, 2:54 pm

insomniakat wrote:
Have all children that have had chelation therapy been competely cured of autism?


I am not arguing for the mercury myth, but I see this garbage touted a lot!

Chelation is simply taking some large, or easily excreted substance that has an affinity for something, and using it to sop that substance up to clean it up. It is almost like you spilled paint thinner(think of it as mercury), on the floor and there is dried paint on the floor(think of that as the mythical neurons), and you place paper towling(the chelation substance) down to pick up the thinner. EVENTUALLY, you will get all the paint thinner up(chelation). The DAMAGE(paint surfaces destroyed by the thinner, and nearby products hurt by the paint) is DONE!! !! ! The chelation does NOT fix that! ALL the chelation did was fix further damage. They have chelation for LEAD POISONING too, but it won't fix the damage.



beau99
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Nov 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,406
Location: PHX

13 Dec 2007, 2:54 pm

Of course mercury is toxic. Nobody denies that.

But the toxicity is neutralized when combined with silver (for amalgam), or other substances. Thimerosal used in vaccines is only toxic when inhaled, ingested or by contact.


_________________
Agender person.

Twitter: http://twitter.com/agenderstar


beau99
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Nov 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,406
Location: PHX

13 Dec 2007, 2:58 pm

2ukenkerl wrote:
insomniakat wrote:
Have all children that have had chelation therapy been competely cured of autism?


I am not arguing for the mercury myth, but I see this garbage touted a lot!

Chelation is simply taking some large, or easily excreted substance that has an affinity for something, and using it to sop that substance up to clean it up. It is almost like you spilled paint thinner(think of it as mercury), on the floor and there is dried paint on the floor(think of that as the mythical neurons), and you place paper towling(the chelation substance) down to pick up the thinner. EVENTUALLY, you will get all the paint thinner up(chelation). The DAMAGE(paint surfaces destroyed by the thinner, and nearby products hurt by the paint) is DONE!! !! ! The chelation does NOT fix that! ALL the chelation did was fix further damage. They have chelation for LEAD POISONING too, but it won't fix the damage.

Yeah.

Chelation, when used for actual metal toxicity, is perfectly fine. It is approved for that.

But chelation when used for autism treatment, is extremely dangerous.


_________________
Agender person.

Twitter: http://twitter.com/agenderstar


Mindtear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 2007
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 721
Location: UK

13 Dec 2007, 2:59 pm

We have magnesium and potasium in our bodies too but we dont go bursting into flames. :wink:

Or, um...Hydrocloric Acid...im sure there are many.



alex
Developer
Developer

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,224
Location: Beverly Hills, CA

13 Dec 2007, 3:03 pm

beau99 wrote:
But chelation when used for autism treatment, is extremely dangerous.


Wow, I just researched chelation therapy and it seems like it's dangerous even for actual heavy metal poisoning and is only used as a last resort, although I may have read the articles incorrectly.


_________________
I'm Alex Plank, the founder of Wrong Planet. Follow me (Alex Plank) on Blue Sky: https://bsky.app/profile/alexplank.bsky.social


ouinon
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2007
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,939
Location: Europe

13 Dec 2007, 3:04 pm

ouinon wrote:
I do believe that AS existed before, all over the world, that it was a lot less "visible" because the world was "kinder" to AS , quieter, slower etc etc etc. But i also think that there is an increase in the more disabling/severe aspects of ASDs, or a "spreading" of the dysfunctions to other parts of the system. And that THEY are a result of pollution/environmental factors.

Otherwise, if ASDs have always been so limiting then we are lucky that the industrial revolution didn't happen sooner.
IF it IS simply a question of changing circumstancess , rather than ever increasing environmental damage to already fragile ( because of AS genes) brain development, then WHY did the world start changing so much to our disadvantage? What has caused society to change so much in the last 50-150 years that we are now so visible, so non-adapted? Why would a neurological group become so swiftly at such a disadvantage? It's totally weird. Makes me think of the ending of the Third Age in Lord of the Rings. :?:

:?: I'm having trouble understanding why ASDs would suddenly become such a problem unless something had actually made them worse ??! Which is why i continue to think that environmental factors have significantly contributed to the recent wave of autism.
Unless it really is that modern society is intolerable to many of us ? :(

Or is it that the rest of society has become intolerant of us? :( 8O

:? :( 8)



Last edited by ouinon on 13 Dec 2007, 3:10 pm, edited 4 times in total.

beau99
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Nov 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,406
Location: PHX

13 Dec 2007, 3:07 pm

alex wrote:
beau99 wrote:
But chelation when used for autism treatment, is extremely dangerous.


Wow, I just researched chelation therapy and it seems like it's dangerous even for actual heavy metal poisoning and is only used as a last resort, although I may have read the articles incorrectly.

It is. But it's sadly the only way of getting the levels back to normal.


_________________
Agender person.

Twitter: http://twitter.com/agenderstar


ToadOfSteel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,157
Location: New Jersey

13 Dec 2007, 3:15 pm

JWRed wrote:
There is a thread with a poll on whether you would rather be "aspie or neruotypical". 78% said they would rather be "aspie". (That has to be the most ridiculous term I have ever heard). That attitude does not help aspies with assimilating into society.


What's even more amazing is that 22% of aspies DO want to be absorbed into a society that is based on lying, cheating, and stealing your way to the top. If anything, it's NT society that is defective, not us.



JWRed
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 30 Nov 2007
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 301
Location: Malibu, California

13 Dec 2007, 3:17 pm

ToadOfSteel wrote:
JWRed wrote:
There is a thread with a poll on whether you would rather be "aspie or neruotypical". 78% said they would rather be "aspie". (That has to be the most ridiculous term I have ever heard). That attitude does not help aspies with assimilating into society.


What's even more amazing is that 22% of aspies DO want to be absorbed into a society that is based on lying, cheating, and stealing your way to the top. If anything, it's NT society that is defective, not us.


The neurotypical society is not perfect. But they are more normal and functional than us. Not to mention, more happy. Arguing that point is delusional.

I understand that point of view. I used to think that way myself. It took me years to overcome the AS way of thinking.



alex
Developer
Developer

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,224
Location: Beverly Hills, CA

13 Dec 2007, 3:22 pm

I've done some more research and it appears that Chelation itself is a naturally ocurring phenomenon in nature. In fact, chelating agents are in shampoos and foods among other things.

chelation therapy on the other hand *is* dangerous.


_________________
I'm Alex Plank, the founder of Wrong Planet. Follow me (Alex Plank) on Blue Sky: https://bsky.app/profile/alexplank.bsky.social


Joeker
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 9 Aug 2007
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 361
Location: The Interwebs

13 Dec 2007, 3:26 pm

Alex: True. But let me ask you this, then. If there is a level of mercury in everyone's blood, won't adding more disrupt the balance? After all, buildups of perfectly natural things inside someone can be dangerous.

And there are reasons why alchohol is considered toxic, including liver problems, and other things. Pizza has cheese, which builds up cholesterol. Everyone's got cholesteral, right? It's when there's more than there should be that we get problems.

Beau: Inhaled, ingested, or by contact? It's being injected straight into our bloodstream. Now, I was never the smartest kind in science, and I couldn't even dissect a worm! But I still know a bit.

Ingestion of something involves the nutrients, etc. being absorbed by the stomach wall and entering the bloodstream. It goes through the bloodstream, and is used by the body. Now, inhaling it puts it into your bloodstream through the lungs, like oxygen. And when it comes to contact, it's not being absorbed by your skin, but going into your veins.

Seriously, either it's toxic or it's not. It's harmful in your body, and that's just when it enters by the way you breathe, or by digestion, or through the skin, and it's less harmful to have it introduced directly into your bloodstream?
I just can't see how that's healthy. Don't get me wrong, I strongly support vaccines. They keep us from getting things as easily, and help prevent epidemics. In Canada, they've taken out Thimerosal years and years ago, back in 1999 was the last of it, I think. I'm glad for that.

As well, the only fatality of Chelation therapy for Autism was an incident involving mistakes on the part of the practitioner. It was the doctor's mistake.

Mindtear: Well, yeah. Of course. But in small amounts. It's part of a balanced system. And if we were to inject more of it, would that likely cause some serious problems?

ToadOfSteel: Well, it comes down to what each party thinks of the poll. 78% may not want to change ito someone else, or 22% thinks that it'd be easier to be normal.

Alex: It's something our bodies do naturally, purging our systems of toxins and such. At least, I think.


_________________
1234
FOUR
Four is the only number which is itself has the same number of letters as it itself is.


beau99
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Nov 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,406
Location: PHX

13 Dec 2007, 3:31 pm

Joeker wrote:

As well, the only fatality of Chelation therapy for Autism was an incident involving mistakes on the part of the practitioner. It was the doctor's mistake.


Yes, it was performed by a DAN doctor who has a history of medical malpractice, yet still denies any wrongdoing.

Chelation therapy has killed others, though.

Including the one already mentioned, three people have been killed by it since 2005. No doubt it has killed others before that.


_________________
Agender person.

Twitter: http://twitter.com/agenderstar


Mindtear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 2007
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 721
Location: UK

13 Dec 2007, 3:34 pm

Kind of lost me.

Introducing anything in large quantities into the body is eventually fatal, even water kills in large enough quantities.



alex
Developer
Developer

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,224
Location: Beverly Hills, CA

13 Dec 2007, 3:37 pm

well I'm surprised there were any fatalities. If you're removing metals from the body, the thing I'd be worried about would be the good metals getting removed and causing some form of long term problems.


_________________
I'm Alex Plank, the founder of Wrong Planet. Follow me (Alex Plank) on Blue Sky: https://bsky.app/profile/alexplank.bsky.social


Joeker
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 9 Aug 2007
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 361
Location: The Interwebs

13 Dec 2007, 3:58 pm

Beau, tell me; Were those treatments done for Autism, or were they simply chelation therapies in general as a whole? Were those three Autistic, being treated with Chelation?
Every medical treatment has the potential to kill someone. Medical mistakes, etc.

Mindtear: I guess what I'm trying to put across is that there is mercury in our blood. Not a lot, but it's there. And adding more may not be wise, like adding Mercury, or any other substances like the ones you mentioned.

Alex: I believe that pharmacies offer over-the-counter supplements for things like Iron, Potassium, and more.


_________________
1234
FOUR
Four is the only number which is itself has the same number of letters as it itself is.


2ukenkerl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jul 2007
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,277

13 Dec 2007, 3:58 pm

beau99 wrote:
Of course mercury is toxic. Nobody denies that.

But the toxicity is neutralized when combined with silver (for amalgam), or other substances. Thimerosal used in vaccines is only toxic when inhaled, ingested or by contact.


That is garbage that the ADA has created for release to dental PATIENTS! I make that very specific claim because they tell DENTISTS the OPPOSITE! The stuff is handled in a manner even more secure than biohazard waste!

The fact is that Mercury is an element and is UNSTABLE! They tried to make people think formaldehyde was stable when mixed with urea. As a kid, I HATED the stench, and almost SCREAMED that it was dangerous, and that the compound was UNSTABLE! NOBODY seemed to believe me, or be able to smell it. Over a decade later, everyone found out I was right, and even put warning stickers on mobile homes made of the stuff.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urea-formaldehyde

Well, AMALGAM is the SAME way, they have proven it, and the ADA even ADMITS it to their collegues!

http://jada.ada.org/cgi/content/abstract/130/2/191

BOTH of these two have been around over 30 years with no obvious harmful effects BUT.....The BOTH ended up being singled out in a possible and downright likely causation of relatively major problems. Frankly, neither was ever needed.