anbuend wrote:
I feel like I'm being argued with more on semantics than on what I said.
It's kind of irksome when people make such remarks as this because what you said obviously has meaning, so of course it is open to misinterpretation (and therefore a 'semantics argument.')
Anyways, now reading it, I realize that you phrased it in a somewhat... oh, what's the right word... 'ambiguous' manner; the extra comma before the 'like' threw me off and it made me think that you were saying 'forms of autism, like Down's syndrome, Fragile X, CdLS, Noonan's, etc.' I'm not meaning to be a total grammar snob, but comma misplacing is really confusing for me (I'm 105% certain I'm not the only person here who looks at every word and punctuation mark to literally find the meaning of a sentence.)
"There are many forms of autism tied to physical conditions like Down's syndrome, Fragile X, CdLS, Noonan's, etc."
Now I understand it, anbuend.