Anders Behring Breivik -Aspie?

Post Reply New Topic

I am quite attached to methodological soundness, and it has not diminished the supply of productive ASD researchers yet. I even listen to the quacks when they adhere to decent methodology, and reference their studies.

I like looking at the face of criminals in their photographs and making my own mind up. When I looked at his photo I didnt think AS immediately. He could be aspie though. If he is aspie he is on the high functioning end of things.

One thing I did notice is a cold, unrelenting look in his eyes. So even if he does have AS he definitely has some sort of sociopathy or psychopathy combined with it anyway. He clearly has no compassion for other humans as he killed so many people.

I have known many aspies and though they often dont have much emotional expression in their eyes, they have a sort of vulnerability that I cannot sense coming from him.

In some photos of him online he makes very confident eye contact with the camera in a way that is uncommon with aspies. I dont get the impression here that he has a problem with eye contact. My guess is sociopath/psychopath. It is very sad as he clearly has a brain disorder, he is definitely not normal.

Anders does not have Asperger's. This thread seems like an attempt to consume other diagnostics into one label. Stick with Human.

what is your evidence for this statement?

Common sense should be enough really. Wheres the evidence that he might have it? I havent seen any good arguments in this thread. Every trait that might seem like aspergers are human behaviour found in MANY disorders and some of them arent even synonymus with disorders at all. Social isolation, World of Warcraft and not so much success with women could surely fit a person with aspergers. Combined with extreme narcissism, 77 murders in cold blood, lies upon lies and good enough social skills. Not so likely afterall.

i think there's a ton of evidence that he has at least a PDD, and you even see some of that from his father and how he conducted himself and their poor relationship.

Really? Please elaborate if you're able.

I was planning on editing that post but totaly forgot...
What i wanted to say was; That itself can be present in many other disorders, like psychopathy. Its not enough to claim what you claim. One trait is not enough for a diagnosis of aspergers.

He is just a monster, he is too evil to be diagnosed with a syndrome or disorder.
really got the chills reading the topic

Here in Britain where left-wing politics since has destroyed our country, in my personal opinion Britain needs an 'Anders Behring Breivik'.

I agree, it is also common for Psychopats to lie during interviews when they get the spotlight shining on them. They are manipulative narcissistics freaks of nature. They should be purged from the gene pool.

Just confront him of all these "Oh, i am so patient" s**t and he'll probably throw a fit, threaten you to death and tell stories of how glorious he is. Psycopathy plain and simple.




No, society just need to lobotomise degenerate people like you who believe in such propaganda.

Ichinin, you are a bloody prick!

There's been no left-wing politics in Britain in my lifetime. You must be thinking of somewhere else.

Oh... wait... lol, you must think Labour are left-wing.

And you are a complete c**t. f**k off back to the 1950's with your left/right BS and ignorant world view.

Ichinin & NorwichAspie:
If you continue with the personal insults there will be consequences.
Consider yourselves warned.


===================
WrongPlanet Rules
===================


Conduct
-----------
The following activities are unacceptable on WrongPlanet:

1. Posting offensive language, comments, video, or images.
Unacceptable content includes swearing; racist, sexist, homophobic language; behavior intended to provoke or belittle other members; violent or sexually demeaning content; sexual fetish; and discussion of excretory function. Posting graphic images or videos of people or animals being harmed is prohibited.

2. Personal attacks.
This includes insinuation, ridicule and personal insults, regardless of whether direct or indirect. Attacking an opinion, belief or philosophy is acceptable, but attacking the person making the comments is not.