This video is just disgraceful to the autistic community.
This is why I said I didn't think you fully understood. People do condone the murders and they do want the parents to go free. And many parents do go free, or with a light slap on the wrist. Why? Because disabled lives are not considered valuable.
I don't recall ever saying that NTs aren't human or that they are superhuman or that they lack weaknesses. I do care about caregivers, I have been a caregiver. I do care about parents with disabled children. But I do not care for the fact that people are so quick to forgive and understand the reasons for premeditated murder. I cannot cross that bridge, and I am not going to try.
I have in the past found news stories for comparison: A woman who accidentally left her child in the car to die from the heat and the way people were literally calling for her blood. This happened in Washington D.C. and people wanted her tried for murder, and I believe she was tried for murder. And she was characterized as a vicious unfeeling monster, even though the truth of the matter is she made a mistake that everyone makes in their lives, a stupid, pointless, all too easy mistake to make - she forgot to do something and didn't even remember she forgot to do it (drop her child off for day care, I believe). I
On the other hand, parents who deliberately, with premeditation, and in full possession of their faculties who choose to murder their disabled children are painted as victims and the news calls upon us to feel sympathy for their actions, and for the horrible burdens that their child placed upon them to push them to the brink of destruction. You can find dozens, if not hundreds of these.
This is illustrative of the dichotomy I'm trying to explain, that children are only precious and valuable if they're untainted, perfect, abled, and have an apparently bright future. If you want, I will try to dig those examples or similar up for comparison.
And I am certainly not claiming that all parents of disabled children are terrible people. I said earlier in the thread and named one parent I do respect, but I'll go ahead and throw in Janissy (as she posted in this thread, and I'd forgotten her name earlier), MrXxx, cyberdad, League_Girl and others on this forum whose names I am forgetting right now.
I don't even think all those parents in that video are terrible parents. I am not even sure that one parent who said she wanted to kill her daughter is generally a terrible parent, although I think saying that in front of her child, or where her child could find out about it was a terrible choice on her part.
People are NOT going to publicly say, "this is the hand that i was dealt", "It's so difficult to maintain this way of life over an extended period of time," and "My back is against the wall, i see no light at the end of the tunnel." What people are conditioned to do in this particular situation is "grin and bear it" because others don't really understand the turmoil these parents are going through OR society does NOT care to hear IT. You see, i can commiserate and understand 'why' the parents in this video behaved the way they did. They finally got someone to actually sit down and listen to them. It was a moment in time when they could speak candidly and let all their fears and insecurities out; they blew caution to the wind, showing raw emotional pain and all the human frailties that go along with IT.
Do I fault these women for this ? Hell NO. Do i condone IT ? Hell NO. But, i sit back, listen, empathize, and understand their perspective though i may not agree with them.
Again, I don't condone the killing of children, period. However, what i can do, is look at another persons perspective, disagree vehemently with what they have done YET have understanding and compassion.
TheSunAlsoRises
Last edited by TheSunAlsoRises on 20 Dec 2011, 12:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
Verdandi
Veteran

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)
Do I fault these women for this ? Hell NO. Do i condone IT ? Hell NO. But, i sit back, listen, empathize, and understand their perspective though i may not agree with them.
Again, I don't condone the killing of children, period. However, what i can do, is look at another persons perspective disagree vehemently with what they have done YET have understanding and compassion.
And I can't do that.
I do fault parents who kill their own children, and caretakers who kill their charges. I do not have understanding and compassion for murder.
I agree with you that society tends to push "grin and bear it" and that is also wrong, although I would say that particular concept places a huge burden on disabled people of all ages, who are expected to "grin and bear it" and just adapt to be as functional as everyone else, even though it is not always possible, and when it is possible it may come at great personal cost.
My sympathy and compassion for others' struggles ends when they use those struggles as an excuse to harm or kill. Maybe it's black and white thinking, maybe it's cognitive dissonance, but I mostly like to think that it's because I find ending another person's life for one's own comfort and convenience to be abhorrent.
Incidentally, that doesn't mean I support violent reprisals against murderers or anyone else. I am opposed to the death penalty, and I think that imprisonment is typically under inhumane conditions that no one should have to tolerate. I do have enough compassion for any human being that I don't want to subject people to suffer as a form of revenge for their crimes.
CockneyRebel
Veteran

Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 118,420
Location: In my little Olympic World of peace and love
One time, I asked my mum if she thought there should be a cure for autism. She said in her usual bitchy tone, "I think that there should be a cure for every illness so that everybody can live their lives in peace!" I said to her "I don't wish to be cured, because I love my quirks and obsessions too much." I even wrote a letter to my local paper about why I don't support Autism Speaks, stating that autism is a pervasive learning disorder and not an illness that needs to be cured.
That video is 5 years old and if Autism Speaks was serious about changing their ways, they would have taken that video down and gave us a public apology by now.
_________________
The Family Enigma
..unless some people don't want society to know what caring for a child with severe autism is like? What interest would that serve if they just STFU and kept their feelings repressed?
This is another false dichotomy.
I do not have any problems with people knowing what it's like to care for a child with severe autism.
Actually it was not directed at you specifically. I have seen people get pissed off that these "kinds" of autism are being represented as though it makes them look bad by merely sharing the same label of "autism".
This is why I said "breaking point". If someone had reached that breaking point it means that a situation has become too much trouble to cope with.
I agree that seeing people with disability as somehow disposable or subhuman is what society does, it would rather them remain segregated, be not seen and not heard and the result is no help, no respite and leaving all the responsibility on families.
Verdandi
Veteran

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)
I know it wasn't. I was elaborating with my own views, but I see I wasn't clear in separating them - sorry.
Oh, and yes, I've seen people get pissed off at that too. Not particularly helpful, that.

I agree that seeing people with disability as somehow disposable or subhuman is what society does, it would rather them remain segregated, be not seen and not heard and the result is no help, no respite and leaving all the responsibility on families.
Yes, so very true.

Also, professional staff tend to be undertrained and underpaid.
Do I fault these women for this ? Hell NO. Do i condone IT ? Hell NO. But, i sit back, listen, empathize, and understand their perspective though i may not agree with them.
Again, I don't condone the killing of children, period. However, what i can do, is look at another persons perspective disagree vehemently with what they have done YET have understanding and compassion.
And I can't do that.
I do fault parents who kill their own children, and caretakers who kill their charges. I do not have understanding and compassion for murder.
I agree with you that society tends to push "grin and bear it" and that is also wrong, although I would say that particular concept places a huge burden on disabled people of all ages, who are expected to "grin and bear it" and just adapt to be as functional as everyone else, even though it is not always possible, and when it is possible it may come at great personal cost.
My sympathy and compassion for others' struggles ends when they use those struggles as an excuse to harm or kill. Maybe it's black and white thinking, maybe it's cognitive dissonance, but I mostly like to think that it's because I find ending another person's life for one's own comfort and convenience to be abhorrent.
Incidentally, that doesn't mean I support violent reprisals against murderers or anyone else. I am opposed to the death penalty, and I think that imprisonment is typically under inhumane conditions that no one should have to tolerate. I do have enough compassion for any human being that I don't want to subject people to suffer as a form of revenge for their crimes.
No, it's not cognitive dissonance. You have a valid opinion and reason(s) for thinking the way that you do.
When it comes to some subjects, we all have strong convictions that can be characterized as Black and White thinking. And, in some situations, i might adopt your point of view, just not in this particular one.
BUT again, there is nothing wrong with your thinking. I understand your arguments, perfectly well. We just have a different perspective. And, that's OK.
TheSunAlsoRises
Last edited by TheSunAlsoRises on 20 Dec 2011, 12:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
btbnnyr
Veteran

Joined: 18 May 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,359
Location: Lost Angleles Carmen Santiago
CockneyRebel
Veteran

Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 118,420
Location: In my little Olympic World of peace and love
I wish that I could be there for the children. Those parents should have talked about their issues in private. They shouldn't have talked about their problems in front of a camera. What if one of those kids found that video tomorrow and asked, "You hate me mommy, don't you?"
_________________
The Family Enigma
Verdandi
Veteran

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)
When it comes to some subjects, we all have strong convictions that can be characterized as Black and White thinking. And, in some situations, i might adopt your point of view, just not in this particular one.
BUT again, there is nothing wrong with your thinking. I understand your arguments, perfectly well. We just have a different perspective. And, that's OK.
Fair enough. Thank you for saying so. I don't mind that everyone doesn't see it my way, but I get frustrated when it seems like facts are being ignored in favor of emotions - although not that emotions are bad. And I didn't think you were doing that - I thought you did not have access to the facts I was referring to.
Anyway, I just saw this story:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-12-20/m ... ts/3739924
They told the magistrate the circumstances of the alleged offending were extremely unusual and the pair would not be a risk of fleeing.
Magistrate Bob Harrap granted the application.
"I am I inclined to grant bail. There are very unusual aspects obviously to the matter and there is no risk of reoffending," he said.
"This is an unusual matter for there to be a charge as serious as this."
A suppression order was continued on the couple's names and other details and on the reasons for the suppression.
The husband and wife were released on $10,000 bail agreements and three relatives were required to act as guarantors, posting $5,000 each.
The couple must report to police twice per week.
Ms Davison foreshadowed negotiations to downgrade the charges.
"This is a most unusual example of an offence of this type and Your Honour may wonder whether ultimately it's the kind of case where the Crown will perhaps pursue alternate charges of criminal negligence," she said.
The case will return to court in March.
You would never ever see these arguments made about parents who starved their abled children. But somehow, because disability is involved it becomes "unusual." And where it looks like a couple deliberately starved their adult daughter to death, they want to downgrade charges to "criminal negligence." That is:
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictiona ... Negligence
A willful decision to kill another human being becomes "the failure to use reasonable care to avoid consequences that threaten or harm."
This is the sort of thing I mean when I say that the attitude toward parents killing their disabled children is one of forgiveness and sympathy, while the attitude toward the children themselves is not.
Verdandi
Veteran

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)
For comparison, here's a family that starved their infant child to death:
http://www.wreg.com/news/wreg-starved-b ... 8941.story
Quote from the story:
That's an interesting contrast to the $10,000 bond in the other case (even accounting for national differences in legal systems and currency).
Also, the case seems to include the possibility of post partum depression, which if true means the mother (Stephanie McCarley) was dealing with problems that she was unable to cope with on her own, and that she lacked sufficient support or even perhaps awareness from her doctor(s) that she should try to seek support if she's unable to function. There's no sympathy for this possibility though, for how hard it was. Why? Because her negligence caused the death of her 6 month old baby son. The couple was charged with aggravated child abuse and first degree murder.
Do you think it's likely that this couple would have killed again? I don't think so. Even if they wanted to (severely unlikely) odds are good the state wouldn't let them keep their children.
I'm not trying to cherry pick examples. I have several more, and I may start a separate thread, after I work out which forum it should go into.
Verdandi
Veteran

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)
Another starvation case in the US:
http://www.dallasnews.com/news/communit ... h-9852.ece
This quote is intriguing compared to the "punished forever" line in the previous:
Now, admittedly, the first quote is a neighbor and this quote is the accused sister's attorney. However, the choice of who to quote and what to quote them saying is a decision the reporter made in bringing this to the news. In the other story, quotes reinforce the parents as negligent monsters. In this one, the quotes reinforce the accused as overwhelmed by caring for her sister who had already lived longer than expected. And that, right there - "This child was not expected to live from birth." What does that say? Does it say that she'd already lived beyond her allotted time, and thus her death is not as tragic? What does it mean? Why talk about when she was expected to die when she did not in fact die of natural causes?
Oh, and:
Kyreshi Lynn Tara Stevenson, 21, has been incarcerated since Sept. 8. She was being held in the Tarrant County Jail on Wednesday with bail set at $35,000. Tasca Johnson
Her mother, Tasca Kuniko Johnson, 36, surrendered Thursday and was immediately released from the jail after posting a $25,000 bond. She was charged Monday.
"Accused of causing serious bodily injury," although an earlier quote mentions homicide. And bail set at $35,000 and $25,000. Still interesting in comparison to the $250,000 bond in the previous article.
Verdandi
Veteran

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)
Verdandi, I remember a while ago we discussed this topic (actiually it was "compassionate killing") and I thought your examples weren't valid comparisons. Much better there, I agree with you that that is disgusting.
Edit: though we should remember that we don't know all the facts and the couple whose disabled child died of starvation could have been negligent rather than murderous. Innoncent until proven guilty and all that.
Verdandi
Veteran

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)
My examples were valid, but narrow and unclear, I think - I don't remember what they were, just that google was giving me very few hits on what I was trying to find, and I wasn't satisfied with what I did link.
Thank you for dropping in to say this.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Quiet Reflections on a Growing Polyamorous Community |
15 Jul 2025, 2:57 pm |
Why Trump has Ghana's LGBTQ+ community on high alert |
20 Apr 2025, 3:27 pm |
SCOTUS Delivers Major Setback for Transgender Community |
20 Jun 2025, 11:03 am |
Why you are never too old to play Video Games |
01 Jul 2025, 7:02 pm |